WikiFX

Reply

As a seasoned trader who prioritizes clarity and risk management, I always make transparency in broker fees and trading costs a top consideration. In my review of Cloudfutures, I’ve found that the fee structure remains unfortunately opaque. The broker is licensed to operate in China and appears to provide access strictly to futures trading—forex and other asset classes are not supported—which means the typical forex spread vs. commission structure does not apply here. What stands out for me, and not in a positive way, is the absence of any publicly available information detailing commissions, spreads (if relevant for contracts), or even the minimum deposit and withdrawal thresholds. This lack of disclosure is concerning, especially given the critical impact fees have on long-term profitability and risk assessment in any futures trading strategy. For experienced traders like myself, knowing exactly how much is being taken out per transaction—whether through a per-contract commission or embedded in bid/ask spreads—is crucial. Although Cloudfutures does have a formal futures license, the limited details shared about cost structures make it impossible for me to fully evaluate the brokerage’s competitiveness or fairness. My own risk guidelines dictate caution when trading with a firm that does not openly communicate its fees. For anyone considering Cloudfutures, I would advise reaching out directly for specific cost breakdowns and not committing any funds until you have these figures in writing. Full transparency is vital for safeguarding your trading capital.