WikiFX

Reply

As an experienced forex trader, I always make it my top priority to thoroughly understand the complete cost structure before engaging with any broker, especially when considering trading instruments like the US100 index. With CHINA SECURITIES, I found that the overall transparency around trading costs for indices is lacking. The broker does not provide clear, detailed information on essential elements like spreads, commissions, or any additional trading-related fees on its platforms. This lack of disclosure poses a real challenge, as these specific costs can materially impact my trading decisions and risk management strategies. What is available from CHINA SECURITIES suggests their general financing and margin lending fees are relatively high—annual rates above 8%. While this does not directly substitute for the all-in cost of trading indices, it raises concerns for me about potentially expensive overnight holding costs or margin requirements, if I were to hold index positions over time. Without explicit information on spreads, commissions, or real rate structures for trading the US100, I cannot accurately estimate or compare the “all-in” trading cost with peers. Given the absence of regulatory oversight and the high potential risk flagged by independent sources, I exercise considerable caution with CHINA SECURITIES. For me, trading indices like the US100 without a transparent breakdown of costs is not prudent. Until detailed fee schedules and clear trading terms are provided, I personally would avoid placing trades on such products through this broker, as cost uncertainties could significantly affect outcomes.