WikiFX

Reply

As a seasoned trader, I always prioritize understanding the full cost structure before committing to any broker, especially for indices like the US100. With Upbest, I found that the available public details focus primarily on their regulatory status and user experiences, rather than providing a transparent, itemized breakdown of trading costs such as spreads, commissions, and other associated fees for trading indices. This lack of clarity is, for me, a significant concern because cost transparency plays a critical role in evaluating the true value and operational trustworthiness of a platform. What stands out is that Upbest is currently regulated in Hong Kong and deals in futures contracts, which may influence their cost structure compared to typical spot forex or CFD brokers. However, based on my cautious approach and looking at their current business score and some mixed user feedback, I would personally proceed very carefully—particularly since one user highlighted issues with platform-related bank cards and unresolved customer service concerns. For me, before trading indices like the US100, I would need to obtain direct confirmation regarding spreads, commissions per contract or lot, overnight financing rates, and any other hidden costs from official Upbest sources or customer support. Until I receive explicit, verifiable information, I remain cautious, as hidden or poorly disclosed fees can erode potential returns and introduce unnecessary risk. In summary, diligence and transparency are my priorities, and I would not trade indices on Upbest without a clear, comprehensive understanding of all costs involved.