简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
coinbase Review
Abstract:**coinbase** (associated with the domain coindfa.com) currently holds a minimal WikiFX score of 1.36 due to its lack of valid regulation. Recent user reports from 2024 highlight severe risks, specifically concerning withdrawal refusals and demands for substantial upfront fees.

Key Takeaways
- Safety Score Warning: coinbase holds a WikiFX score of 1.36/10, indicating a high-risk trading environment.
- Regulatory Status: The entity operates without verified licenses from major financial regulators.
- Withdrawal Issues: Multiple complaints cite frozen funds and demands for “taxes” or “verification fees” before releasing money.
- Identity Caution: This profile (established in 2023) appears distinct from major exchanges, operating via coindfa.com.
coinbase Broker Summary: Safety Score and Key Issues
In this coinbase review, we analyze the specific trading profile associated with the website `www.coindfa.com`. Investors must strictly distinguish between established global exchanges and newer entities using similar names. According to WikiFX records, this specific broker was established in 2023 and is registered in the United States. However, its low influence rank of “E” and a safety score of 1.36 suggest significant deficiencies in its operational security and legal standing.
The primary concern for potential clients is the discrepancy in identity. While the name mimics a famous exchange, the website and establishment date do not match the historical records of the major publicly traded entity. Furthermore, the platform has generated 4 complaints within the last three months, signaling a trend of user dissatisfaction.
The Risk of Unregulated Brokers
When a Forex broker or crypto trading platform operates without a valid regulatory framework, the safety of client funds cannot be guaranteed. Regulated brokers are required to segregate client funds and adhere to strict auditing standards. In contrast, coinbase (coindfa.com) does not show evidence of such compliance, leaving traders vulnerable to operational risks.
Regulation: Is the License Real?
A critical part of any Forex or trading assessment is verifying regulatory supervision. Authorities like the NFA (US) or FCA (UK) provide safety nets for investors.
According to the latest data, coinbase does not hold a valid license to offer financial services. Although it claims a US presence, there is no corresponding distinct regulatory number provided in the WikiFX database that validates authorized brokerage activities.
Regulatory Data Table
| Regulator | License Type | Status |
|---|---|---|
| US Authorities | General/Forex | Unauthorized |
| Global Regulators | — | No License Found |
WikiFX data explicitly states: “No valid regulation found.” This “Unauthorized” status is the primary factor driving the low score. Without oversight, there is no legal recourse for users if the platform denies withdrawals or freezes accounts.
User Reviews: coinbase Withdrawal Complaints
Analyzing user feedback is essential to understanding the actual trading experience. The `casesText` regarding coinbase reveals a consistent pattern of withdrawal failures and financial demands.
The “Tax” and “Verification fee” Trap
A recurring theme in the 2024 complaints is the refusal of withdrawals followed by demands for extra payments.
- Case Evidence (Taiwan, November 2024): A user reported depositing over 31,000 USDT and trading their balance up to 80,000 USDT. When attempting to withdraw, the platform accused the user of “data intrusion” and demanded a 20% verification fee (approx. 16,000 USDT). After the user paid this fee, the platform demanded an additional 50% (over 50,000 USDT), citing further security checks. This cycle of endless fees is a major red flag.
- Case Evidence (Taiwan, July 2024): Another user described being forced to pay a “20% Personal Income Tax” on profits. Even after payment, the funds remained frozen under the guise of “third-party bank supervision.”
Advance Fee Risks
- Case Evidence (Nigeria, December 2024): A user was directed to a support contact (“btcwithrawlsuppotcbid”) and paid $2,500 to facilitate a withdrawal of $6,000. The withdrawal was never processed.
These reports suggest that the platform employs significant barriers to exit. Legitimate Forex and crypto brokers deduct fees from the account balance; they rarely, if ever, ask for external transfers of fresh capital to “unlock” existing funds.
Technical and Cost Complaints
While serious allegations of frozen funds dominate, some users also noted poor trading conditions.
- Case Evidence (Malaysia, February 2024): A trader noted that high fees were eating into profits and that the selection of tradeable assets was limited. This indicates that even if withdrawals were possible, the trading environment itself may be unfavorable compared to industry standards.
Conclusion
Based on a detailed analysis of the available data, coinbase (coindfa.com) presents a high-risk profile for investors. The combination of a 1.36 safety score, a lack of verifiable regulation, and repetitive user reports regarding withdrawal delays and “tax” demands creates a precarious environment for capital.
Recommendation:
Investors are strongly advised to avoid platforms that demand external payments (taxes or verification fees) to release funds. Always verify the broker's official website URL against regulatory databases. For a safer trading experience, prioritize Forex brokers with scores above 7.0 and confirmed licenses from top-tier regulators like the FCA or ASIC. Use the WikiFX app to double-check broker identities and avoid potential lookalike domains.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
