天眼评分
PGM
http://paragonglobalmarkets.com
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
D
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 PGM 的用户还浏览了..
STARTRADER
IC Markets Global
EC Markets
官网鉴定
paragonglobalmarkets.com
192.124.249.117服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
公司简介
| PGM 评论摘要 | |
| 成立日期 | 2013-12-29 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 美国 |
| 监管 | 未受监管 |
| 产品和服务 | 产品/管理期货/客户解决方案。 |
| 交易平台 | CQG/CTS/Trading Technology/QST/Bloomberg/FFastFil/InfoReach/CME Group/Ice |
| 客户支持 | 电话:+1 (212) 590-1900 |
| 电子邮件:info@paragonglobalmarkets.com | |
PGM 信息
Paragon Global Markets (PGM) 是一个独立的介绍经纪人,为在全球衍生品市场交易的期货、外汇、执行和结算客户提供服务。

PGM 是否合法?
PGM 没有受到监管,相比受监管的经纪人来说,安全性较低。


PGM 提供哪些产品和服务?
产品和服务包括三个类别:产品、管理期货和客户解决方案。
产品:为客户提供全球交易所交易的期货和外汇执行服务,包括所有主要全球期货交易所的领先电子执行平台、算法、伦敦金属交易所专业知识、大宗订单管理、护理订单和期权策略管理。
管理期货:作为替代投资领域中与传统投资(如股票和债券)不同的一类资产。投资组合经理,即商品交易顾问(CTAs),使用期货合约作为其投资策略的一部分,并通过在金融工具、货币和商品中建立多头和/或空头头寸来获利。
客户解决方案:包括头寸、买卖、现金活动、余额、保证金、交易等。
交易平台
PGM 提供多种在线和可下载的交易平台,如Trading Technology、Bloomberg、FFastFill等。
| 交易平台 | 支持 |
| CQG | ✔ |
| CTS | ✔ |
| Trading Technology | ✔ |
| QST | ✔ |
| Bloomberg | ✔ |
| FFastFill | ✔ |
| InfoReach | ✔ |
| CME Group | ✔ |
| Ice | ✔ |

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Are there any inactivity fees with PGM, and if yes, under what circumstances are they applied?
As someone who has evaluated numerous brokers over the years, I pay close attention to transparency on fees, including inactivity charges, because hidden costs can affect trading results. When I reviewed PGM, I found their official materials and informational resources notably lacking clarity on whether inactivity fees are charged. There was no direct reference to inactivity fee policies, nor any clear conditions under which such fees might apply. This absence of information stands out to me, especially given the wider context: PGM operates without valid regulatory oversight and is flagged for high potential risk. From my perspective, this raises a caution flag. In my experience, reputable and well-regulated brokers typically disclose all potential account fees—including inactivity charges—upfront and in detail. The lack of regulatory safeguards with PGM amplifies my concern that terms around inactivity penalties, if they exist, may not be transparent or consistently enforced. Because I have not seen any explicit mention or documentation confirming (or denying) the existence of inactivity fees at PGM, I would urge anyone considering this broker to proceed very cautiously. It is critical to confirm all fee structures directly with the broker, as hidden or undisclosed charges could unexpectedly impact account balances—especially given their lack of regulatory accountability. This is not an environment where I would take anything for granted regarding fees or terms of service.
Considering both reviews and your assessment, how legitimate do you believe PGM is?
As an independent trader with several years of experience navigating broker choices, I approach PGM with considerable caution. In my research, I found that PGM, officially Paragon Global Markets, LLC, operates out of the United States and has been around for five to ten years. However, what stands out most for me is the complete absence of valid regulatory oversight. The fact that PGM is unregulated and carries labels such as a “suspicious regulatory license” and “high potential risk” is a central concern. For any trader, especially those dealing with managed futures and FX, regulatory protection can be the difference between recovering lost funds in a dispute and having no recourse at all. While PGM does offer access to a broad range of sophisticated trading platforms and claims experience in diverse markets, none of this offsets the risks attached to its regulatory status. In my professional opinion, a broker’s legitimacy is grounded in stringent licensing and transparent oversight. The lack of this makes it difficult for me to place trust in their operations or safeguard my interests. Ultimately, regardless of its years in business or platform offerings, the absence of credible regulation is too significant a risk for me to feel confident trading with PGM.
What is the highest leverage PGM provides for major forex pairs, and how does their leverage policy differ for other asset classes?
Based on my due diligence with PGM, I’ve found a notable lack of clear information regarding their leverage policy, particularly for major forex pairs and other asset classes. After multiple years in the industry, I’ve come to recognize that transparent and well-documented leverage terms are crucial for assessing operational risk as a trader. At PGM, the absence of regulatory oversight stands out to me immediately, raising my risk antenna—especially since there’s no valid regulatory license and WikiFX even marks their license and business scope as suspicious. While PGM offers access to a range of professional trading platforms and serves various global markets, their public resources do not specify maximum leverage ratios for forex, futures, or managed futures. This ambiguity is not uncommon in unregulated brokers, but for me it’s a clear red flag. Regulated brokers are usually required to publish leverage caps for each asset class, both to inform clients and protect them from excessive risk. Given the lack of regulatory supervision and absence of published leverage information, I personally would not proceed without first securing written confirmation from their support about leverage terms. For me, trading under such unclear conditions introduces more risk than I am willing to accept, regardless of what trading platforms or asset access they claim. Without official, transparent leverage policies, I consider the trading environment at PGM to be unpredictable and potentially unsafe, especially when compared to peers operating under strict regulation.
Which types of trading instruments can you access with PGM, such as forex, stocks, indices, cryptocurrencies, and commodities?
Drawing from my experience as a forex trader, I approach every broker with a clear focus on safety and product range. With PGM, I found that their main offerings cover global exchange-traded futures and foreign exchange (forex) execution services, which means I could trade a wide array of futures contracts and currency pairs. They also emphasize managed futures—this involves portfolio managers (often commodity trading advisors) who take positions across various futures markets, including currencies and commodities. I appreciate this diverse exposure in the derivatives space, especially given that futures can encompass commodities, equity indices, and currencies. However, I did not find any reference to access to single-stock trading, cryptocurrencies, or a straightforward platform for index CFDs typical of retail brokers. The focus is primarily on professional-grade platforms and services for futures and forex rather than stocks or digital assets. Given PGM's unregulated status and the flagged risks, I am extra cautious and avoid extending my trading to products and services not clearly defined as available or safe. For me, sticking only to the core offerings of futures and FX—where their expertise is clearly established—remains the prudent path, and I continue to avoid unsupported instruments like equities or cryptocurrencies with this firm.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
