天眼评分
FX Connect
https://www.fxconnect.com/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
D
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 FX Connect 的用户还浏览了..
HANTEC MARKETS
CPT Markets
PU Prime
官网鉴定
fxconnect.com
208.89.235.202服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
相关企业
公司简介
| FX Connect 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2003 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 英国 |
| 监管 | 无监管 |
| 服务 | 执行灵活性、结算解决方案、交易报告、工作流管理 |
| 模拟账户 | ✅ |
| 平台/应用 | TradeNeXusSM |
| 客户支持 | 联系表单 |
| 电话:+44 203-395-7864,+852 2978-9202 | |
| 地址:20 Churchill Palce,Canary Wharf,London E14 5HJ,英格兰 | |
| 香港中环金融街8号国际金融中心 | |
FX Connect,成立于2003年,是一家总部位于英国的无监管金融公司。提供包括执行灵活性、结算解决方案、交易报告和工作流管理在内的各种金融服务,并提供模拟账户。支持TradeNeXusSM平台。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 提供模拟账户 | 无监管 |
| 提供多种服务 | |
| 多种客户支持渠道 |
FX Connect 是否合法?

目前,FX Connect 缺乏有效监管。其域名注册于2003年1月22日,当前状态为“客户删除受限,客户转移受限,客户更新受限”。如果选择该经纪商,请高度关注您资金的安全。

FX Connect 服务
FX Connect 为客户提供包括执行灵活性、结算解决方案、交易报告和工作流管理在内的金融服务。

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支持 | 可用设备 |
| TradeNeXusSM | ✔ | Web |

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when using a standard account on FX Connect?
Based on my careful review and personal experience in this industry, I could not locate any transparent or official data regarding the typical spread for EUR/USD with a standard account on FX Connect. For me, this immediately raises some caution: reputable brokers usually make this information freely available, as spread transparency is critical for managing trading costs and making informed decisions. What stands out to me is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid regulatory oversight. This lack of regulation means there is no trustworthy third party verifying their pricing or ensuring fair dealing. In my view, without proper regulation, any claims about tight spreads or competitive trading conditions lack meaningful external validation, which is a significant risk factor. Given these circumstances, I approached this question with particular caution. If an unregulated broker does not disclose their EUR/USD spread structure directly, I would personally consider this a red flag. As a trader, I insist on full clarity before ever risking funds. Without published spreads or regulatory safeguards, it is impossible for me to make an evidence-based recommendation regarding their costs or competitiveness. I would advise extreme caution and, if transparency around such core trading conditions cannot be obtained, consider alternative brokers with clear disclosure and robust regulatory status.
What are the key advantages and disadvantages of using FX Connect for trading?
Drawing from my own experience as a forex trader, evaluating FX Connect presents a number of clear considerations. One positive aspect is the availability of demo accounts, which for me has always been essential in assessing a broker's platform and services without risking real capital. The broad suite of services, including execution flexibility and workflow management, seems theoretically attractive, particularly for those who prioritize operational support in addition to pure trading execution. However, for me, the most significant and concerning drawback is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid financial regulation. As someone who values capital security above all, trading with an unregulated broker introduces unacceptable risks. From my perspective, this lack of oversight means there is no assurance that client funds are protected or that operational practices meet industry standards. The platform offered, TradeNeXusSM, is also fairly specialized and less widely known than industry staples like MT4 or MT5, so I would approach it with caution, especially since information about its functionality in a trading context appears limited. Overall, while customer support appears accessible and a demo account is available, I cannot comfortably recommend trading real funds with FX Connect due to the regulatory gap. For me, security and compliance are non-negotiable, especially in an industry as fraught with risk as forex trading.
How do the different account types available on FX Connect compare to each other?
From my experience analyzing FX Connect, I found their account type offerings rather unclear, which is concerning from a trader’s perspective. FX Connect emphasizes services such as execution flexibility, settlement solutions, and workflow management, and they do provide a demo account, which allowed me to test their platform without committing real funds. However, there is no transparent information about distinct live account types—such as Standard, ECN, or VIP—nor about specific trading conditions tied to them like spreads, commissions, or margin requirements. This lack of clear account differentiation makes it difficult for traders like me to compare options or tailor my trading approach. In regulated brokers, these differences are often critical, as account types define risk exposure, costs, and even platform access. The only consistent offering I could confirm was access to the TradeNeXusSM platform and the ability to use a demo account. On top of that, FX Connect is completely unregulated and carries high potential risk labels. This, combined with insufficient transparency around account types, leads me to be very cautious. Personally, as someone responsible for safeguarding my capital, the absence of both clear regulatory oversight and fully disclosed account structures means I would not feel confident using FX Connect for live trading. For risk-conscious traders, this is a notable drawback.
Have you encountered any drawbacks related to FX Connect's platform stability or their customer support services?
Given my experience as a forex trader, I place a high priority on platform stability and reliable customer support—both of which play significant roles in safeguarding my trading activities. When examining FX Connect, I proceed with considerable caution due to their status as an unregulated broker, as highlighted in their background. The lack of regulation alone raises critical concerns about the level of oversight and recourse available should something go wrong, so I approach any potential engagement with heightened scrutiny. Regarding platform stability, FX Connect utilizes TradeNeXusSM as its trading platform. While they promote execution flexibility and various reporting features, I cannot independently verify the robustness or uptime of their system based on publicly available, regulated benchmarks. In my mindset, the absence of regulatory audits introduces uncertainty; unregulated brokers may not be held to the same operational standards, making unexpected outages or unresolved technical issues a real risk. For a trader like myself, this uncertainty can directly impact my confidence in executing time-sensitive trades. On the customer support front, while FX Connect offers multiple contact channels, I remain reserved in my expectations. In unregulated settings, the quality and timeliness of support can vary greatly, and I’m mindful that escalation paths may be limited or ambiguous if disputes arise. Though there is a positive user review referencing helpful and knowledgeable staff, I don’t consider one testimonial sufficient to mitigate the fundamental risks I see due to lack of external oversight. Overall, while FX Connect offers an appealing range of services and a demo account for testing, the combination of unregulated status and unverified platform or support standards means I would exercise significant caution. My advice is always to thoroughly test any broker’s reliability before exposure to live funds, especially in the absence of regulatory protection.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
