天眼评分
Barclays
https://www.barclays.co.jp/home/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
C
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 Barclays 的用户还浏览了..
IC Markets Global
EC Markets
官网鉴定
barclays.co.jp
147.63.166.185服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| Barclays 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 1997 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 保加利亚 |
| 监管 | 无监管 |
| 金融服务 | 资本市场解决方案、投资银行、外汇交易、衍生品交易、基金管理 |
| 客户支持 | Barclays Securities Co., Ltd.东京都港区六本木6-10-1六本木希尔斯森大厦31楼,邮编106-6131 电话:03-4530-1100 |
| Barclays 银行东京分行,东京都港区六本木6-10-1六本木希尔斯森大厦31楼,邮编106-6131 电话:03-4530-5100 | |
| Barclays 投资管理有限公司,东京都港区六本木6-10-1六本木希尔斯森大厦31楼,邮编106-6131 电话:03-4530-2400 | |
| Barclays 服务日本有限公司,东京都港区六本木6-10-1六本木希尔斯森大厦31楼,邮编106-6131 电话:03-4530-1190 | |
Barclays 信息
Barclays 在日本作为其全球网络的重要组成部分,通过 Barclays Securities Co., Ltd.、Barclays 银行东京分行和 Barclays 投资管理有限公司向日本客户提供金融服务,包括商业公司、金融机构、机构投资者和公共机构。
在全球扩张,特别是在2008年收购雷曼兄弟北美业务后,Barclays 已经确立自己作为日本领先投资银行之一。
然而,Barclays 在日本没有受到任何官方机构的监管,这可能降低了其可信度和信誉,值得您关注。

优缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 全球存在 | 在日本没有监管 |
| 声誉良好的母公司 | |
| 提供各种金融服务 |
Barclays 是否合法?
衡量经纪平台安全性最重要的因素是它是否受到正式监管。Barclays 是一家 未受监管的 经纪商,这意味着用户资金和交易活动的安全性得不到有效保护。投资者应谨慎选择 Barclays。

Barclays 服务
Barclays 日本提供包括 资本市场解决方案、投资银行、外汇交易、衍生品交易 和 基金管理 在内的全面金融服务。
Barclays 证券专注于 融资、资产管理 和 咨询服务;

东京分行提供 批发市场接入,特别是外汇 和 衍生品;

Barclays投资管理管理各种资产类别的共同基金,以满足机构投资者的需求。

企业画像
- 2-5年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Is it possible to add funds to my Barclays account with cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT?
Based on my careful review of the available information, I would advise a highly cautious approach regarding the idea of adding funds—whether via cryptocurrency or any other means—to an account with Barclays in its current form as presented here. The broker operates in Japan, but according to the data, Barclays lacks valid local regulation and has a suspicious regulatory license with a high-risk warning. For me as a trader, regulation is the cornerstone of security and transparency; without oversight, there is a much higher risk that client funds may not be protected, and dispute resolution is uncertain at best. There is no mention in the provided context of support for funding through cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or USDT. In my experience, reputable and well-regulated forex brokers will always disclose their supported deposit methods transparently, and any absence of this information raises concerns. Adding funds through cryptocurrencies, while increasingly popular among some brokers, brings its own risks—mainly, limited recourse in case of transaction disputes, potential exposure to price volatility, and, crucially, anonymity that can complicate recovery if issues arise. Given the high-risk flags, lack of regulation, and user reports of withdrawal problems, I would not attempt to fund an account—in crypto or otherwise—without clear, verifiable information and robust regulatory oversight. Always prioritize safety and full transparency.
How do the different types of accounts available at Barclays compare to each other?
From my experience and based on the available information, it's important to approach Barclays’ forex and trading services with notable caution, especially regarding account types. Unlike many brokers that clearly outline standard, ECN, or professional account offerings, I found Barclays’ presentation of distinct trading accounts to be lacking in transparency. Their focus appears largely on institutional services—such as capital markets, investment banking, foreign exchange, and fund management—rather than retail forex trading accounts for individuals. What stands out for me, and should be a decisive factor for any trader, is that Barclays in Japan operates without formal regulatory oversight. Reliable regulation is crucial because it helps safeguard client funds and establish a standard of accountability. Without such oversight, there’s an elevated risk, regardless of the account type you might be offered. Furthermore, the only user review available details significant difficulties with withdrawals and changing account terms, which raises additional trust concerns in the absence of robust regulation. In summary, as someone who prioritizes fund safety and transparent conditions, I have to note that the comparative analysis of account types at Barclays is fundamentally undermined by their unregulated status and insufficient public details. For me, this means I cannot confidently recommend any account structure they may advertise until both transparency and regulatory oversight improve.
Could you tell me what the typical spread is for EUR/USD when trading on a standard Barclays account?
As an experienced trader, I have to clarify that based on the information currently available, I cannot find any definitive or transparent details regarding the typical spread for EUR/USD on a standard Barclays account. In my personal review of the broker, this lack of clear disclosure immediately raises concerns for me. Most reputable and trustworthy forex brokers prominently publish their spreads, particularly for a widely traded pair like EUR/USD, because spreads directly impact every trader’s bottom line. However, the context here shows that Barclays lacks valid regulation in Japan and carries several warning signs such as a suspicious regulatory license and high potential risk. In my trading career, I have learned firsthand that regulatory oversight is a critical layer of protection. When a broker operates without clear regulation and does not provide basic trading condition details like spread ranges, it becomes very difficult for me to trust them with my funds. The absence of this key information means I cannot accurately assess the cost of trading or compare Barclays to other more transparent, regulated brokers. For me, personally, this uncertainty is a strong reason to proceed with extreme caution, if at all. I would advise anyone to be wary and demand full transparency before considering any live trading or deposits.
How much is the least amount you need to deposit to start a live trading account at Barclays?
In my experience as a trader, one of the most important aspects when evaluating a broker is transparency about funding requirements and clear, reliable information on account setup. For Barclays, based on the information available, there is no official or clear indication of the minimum deposit required to open a live trading account. The lack of this detail itself raises some concerns for me. Additionally, what stands out to me is the total absence of valid regulatory oversight in Japan—Barclays currently operates without regulation there, which directly impacts trustworthiness. From a risk management perspective, trading with an unregulated broker means client funds and trading operations are not protected by any governing authority. The user review I came across described a situation where money was deposited ($267 was mentioned as the initial amount) under the impression it would be easily accessible, only for the user to encounter shifting requirements, unresponsiveness, and ultimately no access to their funds. This experience, coupled with the high risk warnings and suspicious licensing status, makes me extremely cautious. For me, the combination of no clear minimum deposit policy and the regulatory concerns would be reason enough to reconsider opening an account, regardless of the initial deposit size suggested by anecdotes. My personal approach is to only fund accounts with brokers who are fully transparent, regulated, and have a proven track record of honoring deposits and withdrawals.








