WikiFX

Reply

In my experience as a trader, evaluating a broker's safety and reliability always starts with its regulatory framework and transparency. Tradition is currently regulated under the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong, which is a recognized and reputable authority. Having SFC oversight, in my view, indicates that the company is held to high regulatory standards. In my years in the forex industry, this kind of licensing has offered a baseline level of customer protection and legal recourse, which is reassuring. Tradition has operated for over 15 years and is part of a global group with a presence in numerous regions, lending it institutional credibility. The variety of products—like FX forwards, commodities, and derivatives—caters more to professional or institutional participants rather than the typical retail trader, and their custom TRADe platform is designed for specific instruments, not broad, retail-focused markets. However, despite its regulated status and global footprint, I have noticed a lack of clarity on some trading conditions, such as spreads, fees, and margin requirements. For me, the absence of detailed information means I would approach with caution and ensure I have fully understood fee structures and platform mechanics before proceeding. I generally prioritize brokers that are not only regulated but also transparent and forthright with all trading terms. Based on my assessment, Tradition is a legitimate and regulated broker, but its suitability largely depends on your trading needs and expectations for transparency. As always, due diligence and careful consideration of your specific requirements are paramount before committing significant funds.