WikiFX

Reply

From my perspective as an independent trader, the regulatory backing of First Shanghai by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong is a central consideration for fund safety. Being overseen by the SFC means that First Shanghai is legally bound to follow robust financial standards and compliance requirements, which could include safeguarding client assets separately from company funds and regularly reporting to the regulator. I find that SFC oversight reduces the likelihood of misconduct, primarily because the regulator actively enforces investor protection measures and can take disciplinary action if issues arise. Having traded with both regulated and unregulated firms over the years, I’ve learned the value of established, transparent oversight. The fact that First Shanghai’s futures arm is specifically licensed to deal in futures contracts (License No. AGK583) reassures me that it has met strict entry criteria and ongoing standards, important for mitigating systemic risks. Nevertheless, regulation is not an absolute guarantee—market volatility, operational risks, and other unpredictables still exist. For me, the SFC license doesn't just guarantee procedural rigor; it adds a layer of accountability that I consider vital when deciding where to entrust my capital, especially in Asian markets known for rapid regulatory evolution.