Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Warnings about the rise of romance scams in the UK forex market, where fraudsters exploit personal relationships to deceive investors online.

In the realm of forex trading, opportunities are frequently intertwined with perils. Envision an investor encountering a purported seasoned trading expert on a social platform, who imparts “exclusive” forex strategies and sketches a vision of effortless profits. Yet, upon transferring funds to a designated account, the platform swiftly manipulates market conditions or outright seizes the assets, inflicting substantial financial harm. This is no fabricated tale but a stark reality confronting UK forex participants in 2025. According to authoritative reports, romance scams have subtly infiltrated the forex ecosystem, resulting in investor losses exceeding £106 million during the 2024/25 fiscal year, with reported cases rising by 9%. This figure serves as a stark admonition: emotional bonds have become the scammers' sharpest tool, while forex's high-leverage framework magnifies the economic fallout for victims.

Conventional romance scams often masquerade as “emergency appeals” or “travel expenses,” but today, perpetrators have shifted their focus to the fertile ground of the forex market. They pose as adept trading consultants, cultivating trust via social media or messaging applications, before steering victims toward “proprietary” forex brokers or signal services. Targets are typically swayed by narratives of outsized returns—such as “doubling down on EUR/USD in a single trade”—prompting them to open accounts and deposit funds. Once the money arrives, the platform either engineers price swings to trigger margin calls or vanishes entirely.
This £106 million loss figure stems from the annual analysis by the City of London Police's National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB), encompassing 9,449 reported incidents in the 2024/25 fiscal year. Among these, forex-related scams account for approximately 30%: financial media assessments indicate that over one-third of romance scam victims are funneled into “high-yield” forex or contracts for difference (CFD) trades, with an average per-incident loss of £11,000. In the West Midlands region alone, such losses neared £2.7 million, while nationwide, investors aged 61 and above bear the brunt, their average losses surging 38% year-over-year from £5,800 to £8,000.
Even more concerning is the refinement of scam tactics through artificial intelligence. Fraudsters employ generative tools to fabricate trading logs or video calls, conjuring illusions of “real-time gains.” On a global scale, these maneuvers have siphoned off hundreds of millions of dollars—recent international efforts have reclaimed $439 million, with romance forex variants playing a notable role. In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has launched probes into several financial institutions' safeguarding protocols, uncovering gaps in suspicious transfer oversight.
To illuminate this issue more clearly, the following key metrics are aggregated from credible sources. These are not mere abstractions but quantifiable reflections of investors' tangible ordeals:
| Metric | 2024/25 Data | Year-on-Year Change | Estimated Forex Share |
| Total Losses | £106 million | +9% (reports) | ~30% |
| Average Per-Incident Loss | £11,000 | 0.38 | Up to £15,000 |
| Victim Cases | 9,449 | 0.09 | Over 2,800 |
| Older Victims (61+) | 40% share | 0.15 | Primarily forex-led |
Sources: NFIB & FCA reports. This table unveils how romance forex scams are transitioning from the fringes to the forefront, particularly on platforms offering leverage up to 1:500, where modest deposits can precipitate cascading risks. In contrast to straightforward romance “aid” scams, this variant is more insidious, cloaked in the guise of “investment guidance.”
Forex trading ought to rest on rational analysis, yet the intrusion of romantic elements frequently warps discernment. Industry specialists underscore that preventive measures surpass remedial actions:
In 2025, this surge in romance forex scams cautions us that greater market dynamism demands correspondingly elevated caution against latent threats. Financial institutions are advancing optimizations in artificial intelligence monitoring systems, while international collaborations are yielding initial successes. Ultimately, investors must maintain unwavering alertness—emotional connections, though invaluable, demand that investment choices withstand rigorous scrutiny. Before entertaining the next “intimate” recommendation, it is prudent to first examine the compliance of the associated trading account.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.