简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
The Most Complained Brokers in the USA in March 2024
Abstract: In the US, several brokers faced complaints in March 2024, raising concerns about their practices and reliability. This article focuses on the most complained brokers during that month, as reported by WikiFX.

In the US, several brokers faced complaints in March 2024, raising concerns about their practices and reliability. This article focuses on the most complained brokers during that month, as reported by WikiFX.
ST5
WikiFX Rating: 1.17/10
Number of Complaints in March: 15

ST5, a China-based brokerage firm, offers a diverse range of market instruments, encompassing Forex, Metals, Oil, CFDs, and Cryptocurrencies. Nevertheless, it's imperative to highlight that the broker currently operates without any valid regulatory oversight, which can understandably raise concerns among traders regarding the safety and security of their investments when trading with ST5.
We have received four exposures against this broker recently.

WikiFX Rating: 1.11/10
Number of Complaints in March: 3

Turbine Trade LTD, an unregulated trading company based in China, presents a concerning profile. With a lack of regulatory oversight, the company operates without the safeguards that regulations provide for transparency and accountability. The absence of clear information on minimum deposits, coupled with varying spreads by account type, adds to the uncertainty surrounding this broker.

Vistova
WikiFX Rating: 1.11/10
Number of Complaints in March: 22

Vistova, a newly established trading company founded in 2023 and headquartered in Saint Lucia, offers a range of financial services. However, it's important to note that Vistova operates without regulatory oversight. The minimum deposit requirement to open an individual account with Vistova is $500.

QOINTECH
WikiFX Rating: 1.19/10
Number of Complaints in March: 21

QOINTECH is a broker based in Japan that has been operating for less than a year. However, it is important to note that QOINTECH currently lacks valid regulation, which raises potential risks for investors. The broker's regulatory status with the United States NFA is categorized as unauthorized, and it exceeds the business scope outlined by its license. Additionally, QOINTECH lacks trading software, which may hinder trading activities. As such, caution is advised when considering engagement with this broker, and it is recommended to explore regulated alternatives with established track records for a safer investment experience.

GFT
WikiFX Rating: 1.02/10
Number of Complaints in March: 8

GFT is an unregulated broker registered in China. This broker has a trading experience of less than one year. Moreover, some traders claimed that this platform is a “fraud” scam. There was an alleged freezing of each users money so that no one could make a withdrawal.

Conclusion
Selecting a reputable broker is a critical decision for investors. The brokers mentioned here have garnered varying levels of trust and scrutiny. Individuals need to conduct thorough due diligence and research before choosing a broker to ensure their investments and interests are protected. Regulatory compliance, reputation, and user feedback should all be considered when making this crucial decision. Although some brokers here have relatively high scores, it doesn't mean you can trust them without care.
WikiFX Rating System is updated in real-time, ensuring investors have access to the latest, most accurate, and comprehensive broker information.
The WikiFX score of a broker can be increased or decreased if the broker is constantly running the business in a good or bad direction. If you want to know more information about the reliability of certain brokers, you can open our website or you can download the WikiFX APP to find the most trusted broker for yourself.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Deriv Withdrawal Issues: Real Client Cases Exposed
Deriv exposed via client cases of withdrawal issues, 13‑month refund delays, severe slippage, and disabled accounts despite multiple “regulated” licenses.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.
