CFI Expands UAE Offering with Direct Access to Dubai Stocks
CFI has added more than 40 Dubai-listed stocks to its platform, widening its UAE product range as forex brokers in the region continue expanding beyond currency trading.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:David Seibert was ordered to pay $10,794,508 in restitution to victims of his scheme. He allegedly accepted over $10 million from 11 participants in his scheme.

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) announced on Thursday that it imposed sanctions against an unregistered commodity pool operator, who was ordered to pay over $13 million.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
According to the press release, David Seibert from Lakeway, Texas, is accused of running a commodity fraud and was found liable for solicitation fraud and the misappropriation of client funds. A permanent registration ban and trading ban were also imposed by the court, which prohibited him from violating the Commodity Exchange Act in the future.
Over $10 million was fraudulently solicited and accepted by Seibert from 11 participants from March 2016 to April 2019. During the time, Seibert claimed to use participant funds for short-term, high-interest, secured 'bridge loans' to third-party borrowers for the purpose of making property repairs while they sought permanent financing.
According to Seibert, he would find the lending opportunities, confirm that the borrower was qualified, and then close and service the loan. However, no loans were originated by Seibert. As a result, Seibert used most of the funds to trade commodity interests in his personal trading account, where he lost over $8.3 million. Funds from other participants were used for personal expenditures by him.
Seibert has been ordered to pay $10,794,508 in restitution to victims of his scheme and $2,278,853 in civil penalties.
Recently, the US regulator announced that it had filed a civil enforcement action against a South African man, Cornelius Johannes Steynberg, and an unregistered commodity pool operator, Mirror Trading International Proprietary Limited (MTI).
Both parties were charged with fraud and registration violations before the US District Court of the Western District of Texas. This action comes a few days after the CFTC slammed a $1.37m fine on Starberry Limited for acting as a futures commission merchant without a permit.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

CFI has added more than 40 Dubai-listed stocks to its platform, widening its UAE product range as forex brokers in the region continue expanding beyond currency trading.

If you've spent any time researching forex brokers, you've almost certainly run into the labels ECN and STP. They sound technical, broker marketing departments use them interchangeably, and the actual difference matters more for your trading costs than most beginners realize. Both ECN and STP are No Dealing Desk (NDD) execution models — neither broker type takes the opposite side of your trade. That alone separates them from market makers and matters because it removes a fundamental conflict of interest. But the way each model routes your order, prices it, and earns revenue is structurally different, and those differences directly translate into the spread you pay, the slippage you absorb, and whether your strategy is profitable at scale. This guide breaks down exactly how the two models work, where they diverge, and which one fits which type of trader.

While trading with any forex broker, the fundamental aspect to look at is its regulation and user reviews. Today, we will examine the RoboForex broker, its offerings, user reviews, regulatory perspective and more. In a nutshell, user reports have been largely negative for this broker in 2026, with many complaining about funds being withheld despite KYC confirmation, illegitimate account termination and other trading aspects. Let’s start investigating all of these in this RoboForex review article.

Did Trade Quo not respond effectively to your fund withdrawal application? Did you fail to receive funds despite complying with all the documentation requirements? Have you encountered an order freeze by the broker during news hours? There have been multiple user complaints regarding the suspected trading operation glitch at this brokerage firm. This article on Trade Quo review analyzes user allegations along with the broker’s product offerings and the regulatory supervision