GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT

According to WikiFX data, GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT (full name Great Golden Brilliant Limited) has a WikiFX core score of 1.78, with a regulatory index of 3.16, a risk-control index of 2.2, a software index of 4.41 and a business index of 4.64. The application classifies the broker as regulated, and the license information shows one active registration: a Currency Exchange License (MSB) issued under FinCEN in the United States, registration number 31000308932814, held by Great Golden Brilliant Limited; the forex license section lists no items. The brand is registered in Saint Lucia, has an operating history of 1 to 2 years, and its business scope is described as a 'Suspicious Operational Region'. A score, a registration or a short operating history should not be treated as a guarantee of safety or reliability, and regulatory protection depends on the specific legal entity holding the license, the license type and status, the products traded and the client's jurisdiction. Overall, WikiFX assessment indicates a high-risk profile, so the safety and reliability of this broker cannot be confirmed and users should exercise caution.

According to WikiFX data, the application classifies GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT as regulated. The license list contains one entry: a Currency Exchange License (MSB) issued under FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network), United States, with regulation number 31000308932814, held by Great Golden Brilliant Limited, and the license status is shown as Active. The forex license category contains no items, so no forex or CFD license is listed for the brand. It should be noted that this registration is a money services business and currency exchange registration rather than a forex trading license, and it applies to the named legal entity rather than automatically to every entity operating under the GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT brand. Whether a particular service is covered therefore depends on the entity, the scope of the license and the client's jurisdiction.

According to WikiFX data, the minimum deposit amount of GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT is not currently publicly specified. The account information section does not list any account types, deposit requirements or related labels, and no transaction terms are disclosed. As a result, the minimum deposit required to open an account cannot be confirmed from the available information.

According to WikiFX data, no specific trading platform list is currently publicly specified for GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT, and there is no confirmation that MT4 or MT5 is supported. WikiFX assessment indicates a software index of 4.41 for the brand, but the available information does not identify which trading terminals or third-party platforms are offered. Platform availability should therefore be verified with the broker's official channels rather than assumed.

According to WikiFX data, the following points can be noted. Pros: 1) The application classifies the broker as regulated, and an active FinCEN Currency Exchange License (MSB, registration number 31000308932814) is listed and held by Great Golden Brilliant Limited; 2) The operating entity is disclosed as Great Golden Brilliant Limited with a registered region of Saint Lucia, which supports basic identification of the company; 3) WikiFX indexes for software (4.41) and business (4.64) are relatively higher than the overall core score. Cons: 1) The overall WikiFX core score is low at 1.78, alongside a regulatory index of 3.16 and a risk-control index of 2.2; 2) The operating history is short at 1 to 2 years, the business scope is described as a 'Suspicious Operational Region', and no forex or CFD license is listed; 3) Several user exposure posts recorded in WikiFX data report withdrawal difficulties and account access problems from late 2025 onwards. These points reflect the available WikiFX assessment and user-submitted records, and they do not constitute a guarantee of performance or safety in either direction.

According to WikiFX data, user exposure records concerning GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT do exist. The recorded posts include claims that withdrawals could not be processed normally from around late 2025, that withdrawal of profits was conditioned on promotional activity or offsetting trades, that identity verification (KYC) checks were used to block accounts, and that the platform's back office became inaccessible. These entries are user-submitted accounts and should be treated as unverified claims rather than established facts. WikiFX assessment indicates that the presence of such exposure records is a risk factor that users may wish to take into account.

According to WikiFX data, the license list includes a United States registration: a Currency Exchange License (MSB) issued under FinCEN, regulation number 31000308932814, held by Great Golden Brilliant Limited and shown as Active. However, the available information does not specify whether GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT accepts clients or provides services in the United States, nor does it set out any regional restrictions, so its availability in the US region cannot be confirmed from the data. In general, availability in a particular region depends on the broker's regulatory qualifications, local legal restrictions on forex and CFD trading, account opening policies, official announcements and customer service confirmation, and user feedback from that region.

According to WikiFX data, information that would help assess suitability for beginners, such as minimum deposit requirements, account types, demo accounts and educational materials, is not currently publicly specified. The available indicators show a WikiFX core score of 1.78, an operating history of 1 to 2 years, a business scope described as a 'Suspicious Operational Region', no forex or CFD license listed, and user exposure posts alleging withdrawal difficulties. WikiFX assessment therefore indicates a higher-risk profile rather than a beginner-friendly one, and no conclusion about suitability for beginners can be drawn from the available information. In general, beginners may consider factors such as regulatory status, account requirements, fee transparency, platform usability, risk controls and the quality of customer support when evaluating any broker.

According to WikiFX data, no payment methods, deposit and withdrawal processing times, or related fee and limit details are currently publicly specified for GREAT GOLDEN BRILLIANT; the transaction terms section contains no entries and no account-level information is listed. In addition, WikiFX records include several user exposure posts alleging that withdrawals could not be processed normally from around late 2025, that conditions such as promotional activity were attached to withdrawals, and that the platform interface later became inaccessible. These are user-submitted claims and remain unverified. On the basis of the available information, the convenience and processing speed of deposits and withdrawals cannot be confirmed.

Due to the temporary lack of clear leverage data, it is not possible to directly confirm its specific leverage level. In general, different brokers and different account types provide different leverage ratios. The common range is from low leverage to high leverage. When evaluating leverage, you should focus on the following aspects: 1. Leverage ratio: The higher the leverage, the higher the potential profit and risk. 2. Differences between account types: Different accounts may provide different maximum leverage. 3. Regulatory restrictions: Some regulators have strict limits on leverage. Usually, stricter regulation means more conservative leverage. 4. Risk control measures: Such as whether stop-out mechanisms and negative balance protection are provided. High leverage can increase profits, but it can also increase the risk of losses. Beginners should use leverage carefully. It is recommended to choose a suitable leverage level after understanding the risks, and follow WikiFX updates on related data and risk evaluation information.

To compare different brokers, investors can make comprehensive judgments from multiple dimensions such as regulatory qualifications, overall ratings, trading environment, account conditions, and user feedback. In general, priority should be given to regulatory status and license information, followed by WikiFX ratings and various indexes (such as risk control, software, and business indexes). At the same time, trading conditions (such as spreads and execution speed) and account information (such as minimum deposit and account types) should also be compared. In addition, user reviews, exposure records, and risk assessment information can also be considered to evaluate broker safety and trading experience from multiple aspects. The WikiFX platform also provides multi-dimensional broker comparison tools. Users can select different brokers for visual comparison and comprehensive analysis, so as to make decisions more efficiently.

To determine whether a broker is regulated, the key is to verify whether it holds a valid financial license. Investors can check the license number and status through the official websites of regulatory authorities (such as Financial Conduct Authority, Australian Securities and Investments Commission) to confirm whether the license is real and under valid supervision. It should be noted that some brokers may engage in license cloning or unauthorized operations, meaning they use another company's license or provide services in regions where they are not authorized. These situations also involve risks. In addition, investors can use WikiFX to check the broker's regulatory status, historical records, and risk ratings as supporting reference, so as to evaluate its compliance more comprehensively.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

A broker can be evaluated as a potential scam platform by considering multiple factors such as regulatory qualifications, user complaints, fund security, and platform data. In general, brokers without valid regulation, those that frequently have withdrawal problems, those with a large number of user complaints, or those providing false information usually carry higher risks. You can check the broker's regulatory status, overall rating, exposure records, and user reviews on the WikiFX platform, and make judgments based on multi-dimensional data to effectively identify and avoid scam platform risks.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.