天眼評分
NFS
http://nfseurope.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:NFS Network Financial Services Ltd
監管證號:328/17
- 該交易商WikiFX實勘差評已達到1條,請注意風險,謹防受害!
瀏覽NFS 的用戶還瀏覽了..
官網鑒定
nfseurope.com
89.234.45.0伺服器所在地英國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| NFS 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2016 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 監管 | CYSEC 監管 |
| 市場工具 | 股票、單位信託、投資信託、資本投資債券和 ETF |
| 模擬帳戶 | / |
| 交易平台 | 投資平台 |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 聯絡表格 |
| 電話:+ 357 25 817 747 | |
| 電郵:enquiries@nfseurope.com | |
| 地址:利馬索爾市市政廳,塞浦路斯 | |
| 區域限制 | 僅限歐盟客戶使用 |
NFS 是一家總部位於塞浦路斯的組織,從歐盟運營並提供投資諮詢服務。其服務涉及儲蓄和投資、股票等領域。目前在 CYSEC 監管下運作。
這是該經紀商官方網站的首頁:

優點和缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| CYSEC 監管 | 僅限歐盟客戶使用 |
| 多樣的交易產品 | 有關交易的信息有限 |
| 帳戶信息有限 |
NFS 是否合法?
遵守塞浦路斯證券交易委員會(CYSEC)的法律監督,NFS,根據NO. 328/17許可,證明了他們在交易服務中的信譽和遵守監管準則。NFS聲稱自己是您和您選擇的產品提供商之間的中介,但不處理客戶資金。NFS只會推薦在歐盟內受監管的產品提供商。
| 監管狀態 | 已監管 |
| 監管機構 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 許可機構 | NFS Network Financial Services Ltd |
| 許可類型 | 指定代表(AR) |
| 許可號碼 | 328/17 |

我可以在 NFS 上交易什麼?
NFS 提供股票、單位信託、投資信託、資本投資債券和 ETF。此外,它還提供包括儲蓄和投資、集體投資和離岸集體投資在內的諮詢建議。
| 交易工具 | 支援 |
| 股票 | ✔ |
| 信託 | ✔ |
| 債券 | ✔ |
| ETF | ✔ |
| 外匯 | ❌ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 指數 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密貨幣 | ❌ |
| 期權 | ❌ |
交易平台
NFS 提供投資平台。通過您的網上帳戶,您可以全天候訪問實時估值。您還可以通過進行轉換和交易來調整您的投資組合。
擁有對多元化投資組合的單一入口和對整個投資組合的整體視圖,使您和您的NFS顧問能夠簡單評估並掌握您的投資狀況。

企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 賽普勒斯監管
- 授權代表(AR)
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Which deposit and withdrawal payment options are available with NFS, such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrency?
Based on the information provided, I was unable to find any clear, detailed explanation from NFS regarding the specific deposit and withdrawal methods available, such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrency. As an experienced trader, I always prioritize full transparency in fund handling—knowing the precise options for deposits and withdrawals is essential for assessing a broker's suitability and operational trustworthiness. The fact that NFS does not clearly disclose these details raises questions for me, especially given that managing client money is a core area where trust is paramount. Additionally, NFS’s stated business model highlights that the company acts as an intermediary between clients and regulated product providers, and claims not to handle client funds directly. This is an important distinction, as it means that traditional payment options often associated with direct account deposits—such as credit cards or e-wallets—may not even be handled directly through NFS. In my experience, when the broker does not hold client money, the process for funding and withdrawals tends to rely on arrangements with third parties, which can sometimes result in additional delays or complications. In summary, due to the limited and vague information about payment methods, I would encourage potential clients to exercise caution and seek direct clarification from NFS regarding how funds are moved in and out, as well as what specific options are available. For me, unless all payment options and security measures are clearly stated, I am hesitant to proceed—especially with any firm flagged for high potential risk or operational ambiguity.
Can you outline the particular advantages NFS offers in terms of its available trading instruments and how its fee structure is organized?
In my experience reviewing brokers, the main advantage NFS offers lies in its specialized range of regulated investment instruments rather than broad traditional trading products. NFS is regulated under CYSEC as an Appointed Representative, and while that gives some reassurance regarding oversight and compliance with EU financial rules, I urge caution and always recommend independently verifying regulatory status. Their offering includes equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs. There is no forex, commodities, indices, or cryptocurrency trading available—this focused lineup could be attractive for those specifically seeking diversified, regulated investment products within the EU, but unsuitable for forex or derivative traders. Regarding fees, the publicly available information is quite limited. I could not find clear disclosures on commission rates, spreads, or account maintenance costs. In my view, the lack of transparent fee structure details makes it difficult to assess the cost competitiveness of NFS. This absence of critical cost information raises questions about ongoing charges or potential hidden fees, which is particularly important to clarify given their role as intermediaries rather than direct fund managers. Ultimately, while the advantage with NFS is the access to EU-regulated instruments under a CYSEC framework, the narrow product range and opaque fee structure require cautious due diligence. For anyone considering NFS, I would strongly advise reaching out directly to request comprehensive, written details on all charges before any commitment is made. This kind of proactive approach has been important for me in safeguarding my capital and ensuring a clear understanding of my total costs as an investor.
Based on your own experience, what do you consider the three biggest benefits of using NFS?
Reflecting on my experience with NFS, I find that its regulatory status under CYSEC stands out as one of the key advantages. In the world of trading and investment advisory, especially within the EU framework, this oversight provides a foundation of trust for me, as rigorous supervision reduces the probability of misconduct and ensures adherence to established standards. Additionally, NFS's role is specifically as an appointed representative, meaning it acts as an intermediary and does not itself handle client funds. For me, this separation further mitigates certain risks and reassures me that my money isn't being directly exposed to the broker's operational risks. Another benefit I've experienced is the variety of regulated investment products accessible through NFS—including equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs. From a portfolio diversification standpoint, this breadth is valuable, especially since NFS gathers only regulated product providers within the EU, which aligns with my preference for transparency and compliance in the products I access. Lastly, NFS's commitment to providing clients with real-time access to their portfolio, along with the ability to adjust or switch investments online, has improved my sense of control and oversight. While NFS's services are narrower in scope—without forex, commodities, or crypto—I see this simplicity as a benefit for investors focused on traditional, supervised instruments. Conservative investors like myself may find this focused approach reassuring. However, I remain mindful of highlighted risks and recommend ongoing vigilance, especially due to the flagged "suspicious scope of business" and the limitation to European clients.
Does NFS charge a commission per lot on their ECN or raw spread account types?
Based on my independent evaluation and the information presented about NFS, I cannot confirm that NFS charges commissions per lot on ECN or raw spread account types. In fact, my research indicates that NFS does not operate as a traditional forex or CFD broker offering ECN or raw spread accounts. Instead, NFS appears to function primarily as an investment consultancy, delivering access to equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs rather than typical spot forex or leveraged trading instruments. From my perspective, this is a substantial distinction. Traders accustomed to standard forex brokerage models that publish transparent commission structures—where it’s common to see a per-lot commission on ECN accounts—should not expect the same structure here. The company does not handle client funds directly, and its disclosures around account types and transaction costs are minimal. This lack of detailed information around typical trading fees is a red flag for me as someone who values transparency. Furthermore, the stated “suspicious scope of business” and “high potential risk” warnings, along with the observation that their regulatory standing is an appointed representative under CYSEC and not a full-scope dealing license, give me pause. For traders seeking straightforward cost disclosures and a more robust forex or CFD trading environment, I would proceed cautiously and seek full clarification from NFS directly before considering account opening or any trading activity.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
