WikiFX

Sagot

As someone who has traded forex and indices with a range of different brokers, understanding the total trading costs is always a priority for me. For M&H, however, I need to exercise particular caution, especially regarding indices like the US100. Based on my research and what I've learned from reviewing M&H, the fundamental challenge is that their official website is currently inaccessible, and there is a marked lack of published transparency about their actual trading conditions—including specific spreads, commissions, or swap rates for any instruments. This absence of critical information means that I cannot determine or verify what the total trading costs would be for an index like the US100 with M&H. In well-regulated firms, these costs are always clearly outlined, allowing traders to make informed decisions and avoid unexpected expenses. By contrast, M&H operates entirely unregulated—there is no valid regulatory oversight—and this alone significantly increases risk in areas such as pricing, fairness, and fund safety. Moreover, I place great value on reliable access to a broker’s platform and customer support before committing any capital. With M&H’s website being routinely inaccessible and only minimal contact options available, it’s impossible for me to access detailed fee schedules or real-time trading information—even the funding and withdrawal process is manual and lacks transparency. From my experience, this level of opacity around trading costs is a red flag, and I would not proceed without verifiable details. For anyone considering M&H for index trading, I urge the utmost caution: in my opinion, the absence of published costs for the US100 makes it impossible to assess the true expense—and risk—of trading with this broker.