简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC charges 5 Fruits Enterprises with fraud
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a civil enforcement action against Las Vegas-based 5 Fruits Enterprises LLC, its founder, Calvin Guess, and co-manager Marcus Ligon, accusing them of running an investment fraud scheme that used automated trading “bots” to defraud investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a civil enforcement action against Las Vegas-based 5 Fruits Enterprises LLC, its founder, Calvin Guess, and co-manager Marcus Ligon, accusing them of running an investment fraud scheme that used automated trading “bots” to defraud investors. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on September 4, 2025, alleges the defendants falsely represented that investor funds were being traded by profitable automated systems when those bots either did not exist or were not used as advertised.
According to the SEC, 5 Fruits marketed options-trading services and promised investors high, consistent returns driven by proprietary automation. The agency says promotional materials and direct communications overstated performance and misrepresented how client funds were handled — conduct that, the SEC asserts, violated the federal securities laws. Bloomberg Law reported regulators' view that the advertised trading bots “didnt really exist,” a central allegation in the SECs case.
The court's final judgment against 5 Fruits Enterprises details monetary remedies. The judgment orders disgorgement of $1,156,166.13 (net profits) plus prejudgment interest of $253,048.11, and imposes a civil penalty on the defendants, reflecting the SECs demand that ill-gotten gains be returned and future misconduct be deterred. The judgment is publicly available in the SECs litigation files.
What this means for investors: the SECs action underscores the risk of trusting online promises of automated trading returns without verifiable evidence. Investors tempted by “bot” trading services should demand audited performance records, clear custody arrangements, and independent verification of trading activity before committing funds. Regulators have increasingly targeted schemes that use flashy technology claims to mask misappropriation or false performance reporting.
The SEC's litigation release and accompanying court documents provide the full complaint, judgment, and related materials for public review. As enforcement activity continues, the case against 5 Fruits Enterprises highlights both the persistent creativity of fraudsters and the SECs focus on protecting retail investors from deceptive trading schemes. For investors and advisers, the key takeaways are diligence, skepticism of unverifiable automation claims, and the importance of using regulated custodians and transparent platforms.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Neotrades Review: Traders Claim Profit Cuts, False Assurances & Unfair Terms
Do you feel constant pressure from Neotrades to deposit your forex capital? Were you given a false assurance by the broker on recovering your trade losses? Have all your profits been wiped to ZERO on the Neotrades login? Does the Mauritius-based forex broker apply stringent terms and conditions for profit withdrawals? In this Neotrades review article, we have showcased these complaints. Read them below.

Thailand Strikes Back: Online Scam Losses Plunge ฿195M+
Thailand’s Anti-Cyber Scam Centre (ACSC) reported 392 fewer online scam cases and a 31.4% week-on-week drop in losses—over ฿195 million saved—driven by police suppression and public awareness. Authorities caution that syndicates are relocating and exploiting events (e.g., southern floods). While online purchase fraud remains most common, “reward transfer” scams now cause the highest losses, surpassing investment scams.

FXFlat Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Issues, High Slippage & Poor Customer Support Service
Making profits, but FXFlat is cancelling all of them? Do you constantly face losses due to slippage by the Germany-based forex broker? Is your forex trading account getting deactivated after making the FXFlat withdrawal request? Do you have to constantly deal with poor customer support issues? You are not alone! Many traders have openly expressed their frustration over these issues online. In this FXFlat review article, we have shared some of their complaints. Read on!

When the Licence Disappears: What Traders Overlook About Their Brokers
In the foreign exchange and online trading industries, regulation is often referred to as a technical requirement. Yet for traders of all levels, a broker’s regulatory status is one of the most fundamental markers of safety and transparency. When a broker loses its licence, it is never a minor administrative event. It signals structural problems that can place client funds and trading conditions at significant risk. Understanding why brokers lose their licences, what it means, and how traders can stay informed is essential in today’s rapidly shifting financial landscape.
