CySEC Warns Public of Four Unauthorised Investment Firms
CySEC alerts investors about four unlicensed investment firms operating without authorisation under Cyprus law.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Malaysian traders using OctaFX Malaysia should take note of a significant update affecting their accounts. As of 18 August 2025, the broker has disabled deposits via Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) for clients in Malaysia.

Malaysian traders using OctaFX Malaysia should take note of a significant update affecting their accounts. As of 18 August 2025, the broker has disabled deposits via Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin (BTC) for clients in Malaysia. This restriction applies only to deposits, while withdrawals in these cryptocurrencies will continue as usual.
At first glance, OctaFX presents itself as a long-established, professional broker with a strong international presence. Its sleek website, diverse range of trading instruments, and claims of regulatory oversight often reassure traders. However, a closer OctaFX review conducted by WikiFX reveals a different story.

The Securities Commission of Malaysia (SC) has officially placed OctaFX on its Investor Alert List. The regulators notice states that OctaFX has been conducting derivative trading activities without a valid licence and operating a recognised market without authorisation. This means that, despite its global reputation, OctaFX is currently operating in Malaysia without proper approval from the SC.

Globally, OctaFX does hold a licence with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) under licence number 372/18, registered as a market maker. While this offers a degree of legitimacy in Europe, it does not cover operations in Malaysia. This is where many investors misunderstand the concept of regulation. Being licensed in one jurisdiction does not automatically mean a broker is authorised everywhere.

For Malaysian traders, this distinction is crucial. A brokers regulation is only effective in the regions where it is recognised. In the case of OctaFX Malaysia, clients lack the local protections that come with dealing through an SC-approved broker. This exposes traders to risks such as limited recourse in cases of disputes, delayed fund recovery, or potential malpractice.
In every circumstance, investors should not only verify whether a broker is regulated, but also ensure that it is authorised specifically within Malaysias legal framework.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

CySEC alerts investors about four unlicensed investment firms operating without authorisation under Cyprus law.

Is your MBFX withdrawal request pending even after months of raising it? Has the broker defrauded you? Does the broker keep changing spreads to pile losses for you? Have you lost due to its copy trading activities? Is the customer support service silent to your trading queries? Many traders have called out the broker for these alleged wrongdoings. In this MBFX review article, we have highlighted these trading concerns. Read on!

Headway Broker review: FSCA license exceeded, unregulated claims, and 86+ user complaints.

Vida Markets regulation exceeded under FSCA. Broker review covers accounts, platforms, and risk considerations.