IG Review for India 2026: RBI Alert List, Regulation, Login, and Forex Risk
IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Hong Kong’s SFC issues new rules for Virtual Asset Trading Platforms, prioritizing custody and security amid rising cyber risks.

HONG KONG, August 15, 2025 — The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has unveiled stricter guidelines for licensed Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (VATPs), reinforcing regulatory oversight amid surging global cyber threats.
The updated framework sets out minimum standards for senior management accountability, client fund protection, cold wallet infrastructure, and third-party custody arrangements. The directive follows an SFC review earlier this year that uncovered weaknesses in how exchanges managed security controls.
According to the regulator, the measures are designed to strengthen virtual asset custody and security and prepare the market for the adoption of more advanced technologies under its ASPIRe roadmap.
SFC Executive Director of Intermediaries, Dr. Eric Yip, stressed that investor protection remains central to the watchdogs mandate. “For Hong Kong to build a trusted and sustainable digital asset ecosystem, safeguarding client assets must always remain a top priority,” he said.

The new rules come just weeks after Hong Kong enacted its Stablecoin Ordinance, requiring all stablecoin issuers—local and overseas—to secure a license from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). This move complements broader efforts to solidify the citys role as a key hub in the digital asset ecosystem in Asia.
Inflows of $1.5 billion in equity placements in early August signaled growing investor confidence, even as regulators tightened market supervision. Authorities also instructed brokers to pause stablecoin-related promotions in response to rising fraud risks.
Concerns extend beyond Hong Kong. Chinas Ministry of State Security (MSS) recently warned against cryptocurrency projects collecting biometric data through iris scans, citing national security concerns. Meanwhile, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis reported that cryptocurrency scams surged to $2.17 billion in 2025, with a single hack on exchange Bybit accounting for $1.5 billion of the losses.
For licensed VATPs, the changes mark a shift toward stricter oversight and align Hong Kong with evolving global practices around digital asset regulation. Industry experts note that firms operating in the region must quickly adapt to the SFCs new standards, reviewing custody frameworks, compliance policies, and disaster recovery protocols.
By tightening its framework, Hong Kong not only strengthens cryptocurrency regulation in Hong Kong but also signals its intent to lead in setting best practices for safeguarding investors in the rapidly expanding global market.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.

ThinkMarkets review for India: check the RBI Alert List, overseas entities, regulation, login security, forex rules, costs, withdrawals, and leverage risk.

Did mirrox, a brokerage firm, ask you to keep your margin level above 250%-300% and make you add funds immediately if it dropped below it? Did the broker prevent you from opening a trade despite having a healthy equity balance? Did it close your trading account upon a withdrawal request? Many traders have raised these concerns online while sharing their respective mirrox reviews. This article aims to examine these user allegations while answering the popular question: Is mirrox legit or a scam?