简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Fake Trader Faces 20 Years & RM9 Million Fine for RM1.45 Mil Derivatives Scam
Abstract:A Malaysian man who posed as a ‘licensed’ futures trader has been handed a 20-year prison sentence and a RM9 million fine after admitting to running a fraudulent derivatives investment scam.

A Malaysian man who posed as a ‘licensed’ futures trader has been handed a 20-year prison sentence and a RM9 million fine after admitting to running a fraudulent derivatives investment scam.
The Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court found Mohd Azhidi bin Laili guilty of deceiving nine investors between May 2013 and March 2014. Operating under the guise of an investment linked to crude palm oil (FCPO) futures through AmFutures Sdn Bhd, Azhidi misled victims into believing they were participating in a legitimate trading programme. The scheme, however, never existed in the first place.
Judge Puan Hamidah binti Mohamed Deril imposed nine separate sentences under section 206(b) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) with two years imprisonment and a RM1 million fine for each charge. The jail terms will run concurrently. Should the fines remain unpaid, Azhidi faces an additional 27 months in prison upon completion of his primary sentence.

Azhidi also admitted to a further offence under section 59(1) of the CMSA for falsely presenting himself as an authorised representative of AmFutures without holding the necessary licence. For this, the court ordered an additional two years imprisonment, to be served concurrently.
The case first reached the courts in February 2022, shortly after Azhidis arrest. Initially pleading not guilty, he was released on RM250,000 bail with two sureties and was required to surrender his passport and report monthly to the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC). His trial began in February 2023 and continued into early 2025, with testimony from 28 prosecution witnesses, including seven victims.
However, his bail was revoked in May 2024 when he failed to appear in court for two scheduled mentions and neglected to comply with his monthly reporting obligations. The court ruled that his sentence would begin from the date his bail was withdrawn.
Prosecution was led by SC Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Izuddin Mohamad, supported by officers Quek Yiing Huey, Raihana Nadhira Rafidi, Eunice Ong Jo Xing, and Mark Rohan Mahadevan. Azhidi was represented by counsel Al-Sabri Haji Ahmad Kabri.
The SC stressed that the outcome underscores the severe consequences of unlicensed trading activities and the harm such scams can inflict on the capital market. The regulator has urged the public to remain cautious and verify any investment opportunities through its Investment Checker tool available on its official website.

As incidents like this become increasingly common, tools such as WikiFX can play a vital role in helping individuals verify the legitimacy of brokers and financial platforms. WikiFX offers an extensive database of global broker profiles, regulatory status updates, and user reviews, enabling users to make informed decisions before committing to any financial investment. Its risk ratings and alerts for unlicensed or suspicious entities help investors easily spot red flags and avoid potential scams. By using tools like WikiFX to research a broker's background, individuals can safeguard their hard-earned savings and reduce the risk of falling victim to fraudulent schemes.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

KKR Exposed: Traders Allege Fund Scams, Withdrawal Denials & Regulatory Concerns
Do you witness a negative trading account balance on the KKR broker login? Does the broker prevent you from withdrawing your funds after making profits? Do you need to pay an extra margin for withdrawals? These trading issues have become common for traders at KKR. In this KKR broker review article, we have elaborated on the complaints. Take a look!

In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Regulation and License Overview: A Trader's Due Diligence Report
This in-depth overview will conduct a thorough Uniglobe Markets regulatory status and financial authority check. By dissecting data from regulatory bodies, corporate registries, and user-reported experiences, we will provide a clear, data-driven analysis of the protections—or lack thereof—afforded to clients. The central question we aim to answer is whether Uniglobe Markets meets the stringent safety standards required by serious, long-term traders.

Kraken Review: A Tale of Unsolved Withdrawal Issues & Poor Customer Support Service
Does Kraken disallow you from withdrawing your trading capital, including profits? Does it demand extra deposits in exchange for fund withdrawals? Is the customer support service inept in solving your forex trading queries involving deposits and withdrawals? In this Kraken review guide, we have discussed these complaints. Read on to explore the complaints against the US-based forex broker.

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.
