World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has issued a directive to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin evaluating cryptocurrency holdings as part of mortgage risk assessment criteria.

The U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has issued a directive to mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin evaluating cryptocurrency holdings as part of mortgage risk assessment criteria.
The move marks a potential turning point for crypto adoption in the U.S. housing market and reflects the federal governments evolving stance on digital assets.
A Boost for Crypto-Holding Borrowers
The directive, announced Wednesday by FHFA Director William Pulte via social media, signals an effort to make mortgage financing more accessible for homebuyers who hold digital assets.
“After extensive research and in line with President Trump‘s vision to make America the ’crypto capital of the world, I have directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare for the inclusion of cryptocurrency holdings as recognized assets in mortgage applications,” Pulte posted.
While some smaller lenders in the U.S. have previously accepted crypto as collateral, this is the first time a federal housing authority has formally acknowledged digital assets in mortgage underwriting standards.

The FHFA's move comes at a time when mortgage application volumes remain sluggish, weighed down by high interest rates and affordability challenges. By expanding the definition of eligible assets, the agency is not only increasing accessibility but also potentially stimulating loan activity in a stagnating housing market.
Analysts note that this change could unlock lending opportunities for a growing segment of digitally native borrowers who may not hold significant traditional assets but possess meaningful crypto wealth.
Unanswered Questions Remain
However, the directive stopped short of specifying which cryptocurrencies will be eligible for consideration. This lack of clarity raises questions around volatility, valuation methods, and regulatory consistency, particularly as crypto markets remain highly fluid and decentralized.
Industry experts stress the importance of clear guidelines to prevent abuse and ensure that lenders can accurately assess risk.
“This is a bold step, but the details will matter. Without standardized rules on acceptable coins, pricing models, and custody requirements, implementation will be complex,” said a senior analyst at a Washington-based financial policy think tank.
Aligning with the Trump Administration's Crypto Agenda
The FHFA‘s move aligns closely with the Trump administration’s broader agenda to promote cryptocurrency adoption across financial sectors. Since returning to the political spotlight, former President Trump has repeatedly voiced support for blockchain innovation and digital finance infrastructure in the U.S.
The decision also hints at a larger regulatory shift, where federal agencies may begin integrating crypto considerations into other forms of financial oversight and risk modeling.
Conclusion
By instructing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to prepare for crypto asset integration, the FHFA is signaling a historic shift in U.S. housing finance policy. While challenges around implementation, regulation, and market volatility remain, the move opens new doors for crypto-savvy homebuyers and brings the U.S. one step closer to mainstreaming digital assets.
As the details unfold, all eyes will be on how the mortgage industry responds — and whether the FHFAs bold step will usher in a new era of crypto-backed home ownership.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Have you experienced issues with Pepperstone deposit & withdrawal processing? From your experience, do you feel that the Australia-based forex broker causes losses to its clients? Did the brokerage entity freeze your account and give you a margin call? All these trading allegations have been rampant on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This Pepperstone review article takes a close look at the user complaints, especially in 2026. Additionally, we have given an overview of the regulatory framework under which the brokerage entity operates.

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.