简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
$1.1 Million Default Judgement Passed Against Keith Crews in Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme
Abstract:A Georgia-based federal court has passed a $1.1 million default judgment against Keith Crews on June 3, 2025, in the Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme. Read on to know more.

A Georgia-based federal court has passed a $1.1 million default judgment against Keith Crews on June 3, 2025, in the Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme. Judge Tiffany Johnson while passing the order mandated Crews to forfeit $530,000 in ill-gotten proceeds, a civil penalty worth $530,000, and a prejudgement interest charge of $50,878. Crews was permanently banned from offering securities as he ignored the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission) August 2023 complaint.
Revealing the Fraud Game Through Stemy Coin
Crews purportedly raised $800,000 from around 200 investors by selling Stemy Coin from October 2019 to May 2021. He falsely represented that Stemy Coin was built using stem cell technology and hard assets such as gold. He issued marketing materials and direct solicitations that claimed partnerships with functional laboratories and doctors. However, nothing of that sort was prevalent. Crews used personal connections to build trust across African-American community organizations and church networks and defaulted with them.
The SEC complaint explains the illegitimate approach Crews adopted to build his businesses. Stem Biotech and Four Square Biz were built to look legitimate. He made dividend and coin appreciation promises through stem cell treatments and proprietary blockchain banking systems. However, the official investigation didnt find any products, labs or partnerships.
More Breakthroughs into the Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme
The investigation found a complete fabrication regarding the Stemy Coin‘s $0.001 valuation per token. There was nothing valued against the coin. Investors were convinced that their funds would enable advanced medical research. However, bank records told a different story. Crews backtracked by diverting proceeds for personal purposes such as buying luxury items. State regulators received official complaints arising from unpaid bills. The order further revealed a chain of ghost partnerships and fake financial reports. Crews refused to respond to the lawsuit filed against him. That only accelerated the default judgment, bypassing a trial that might have revealed additional liabilities. The Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme adds to the list of SEC’s crypto enforcement actions led by Chair Paul Alkins. Alkins has expressed the need for a clear policy to litigation since assuming office at the year beginning. While Coinbase and Uniswap were cleared of the charges leveled against them, the default judgment passed against Crews reaffirms the SECs commitment to crack down on obvious fraudulent activities.
The Chances of Investors Receiving Money are Slim
Although the federal court passed the $1.1 million default judgment against Crews, the chances of investors receiving their money are less. As per public records, Crews does not have visible assets barring a mortgaged property in Kennesaw, Georgia. While the law pursuit of disgorgement, a restitution of net profits, would help investors receive their sums in dollars, Crews non-appearance in court and his no legal representation hint at slim recovery possibilities.
The Voice of Due Diligence on Cryptocurrency Investments Become Louder
The Stemy Coin Fraud Scheme has reignited talks around the need for due diligence on cryptocurrency investments. The Stemy Coin scam shares insights into risks in projects that have been audited by a third party or don‘t have any open roadmap record. Crews promoted the fraudulent scheme to non-accredited investors, a lot of them didn’t have institutional-grade research platform access, as per the litigation order passed by the SEC. With such access, these investors could have easily evaded the financially tragic incident.
The matter has made cryptocurrency investor groups demand increased investor education to prevent such fraudulent schemes. Blockchain analytics, however, report increased scrutiny of low-cap tokens promoting absurd medical or AI integration promises.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Angel one 2025 Review & Complaints
Angel One is a well-known name in the forex market. People are familiar with the name , but is this broker really worth your interest? What do real users say about Angel One, and what complaints have they shared? In this Angel One 2025 review, you will explore all these details.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Interactive Brokers Fined for FINRA Market Data Lapses
Interactive Brokers fined $150,000 by FINRA over Vendor Display Rule violations and supervisory gaps; firm adds real-time consolidated data displays.
