Vietnam Becomes New Base for Cross Border Scam Syndicates After Cambodia Crackdown
Cross border scam syndicates are constantly adapting to evade law enforcement by moving from Cambodia to Vietnam.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:A global investment training company operating under multiple brand identities has come under intense legal scrutiny after being accused of defrauding consumers of over $1 billion. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the state of Nevada jointly filed a lawsuit on Thursday, alleging the company used deceptive tactics and exaggerated income claims to lure thousands of individuals into its schemes.

A global investment training company operating under multiple brand identities has come under intense legal scrutiny after being accused of defrauding consumers of over $1 billion. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the state of Nevada jointly filed a lawsuit on Thursday, alleging the company used deceptive tactics and exaggerated income claims to lure thousands of individuals into its schemes.
The business, collectively known as IML, conducted operations under various names, including IYOVIA, IM Mastery Academy, iMarketsLive, and IM Academy. It promoted training in areas such as cryptocurrency, binary options, foreign exchange, and stock trading. Regulators claim that while IML promised substantial financial returns, internal data painted a far bleaker picture.

According to the complaint, IMLs marketing suggested that individuals could earn as much as $750,000 a month. However, the reality was starkly different. Only a small fraction, roughly 20%, of participants made more than $500 in sales commissions. For the majority, average annual earnings amounted to just $77.51 in 2022.
The FTC highlighted that the organisation primarily targeted young adults through social media campaigns, particularly those aimed at college students. Investigations revealed that many of IMLs so-called “educators” lacked formal financial qualifications, often relying on content from platforms such as YouTube or internally generated promotional materials. This raised concerns about the quality and legitimacy of the training provided.
Furthermore, data indicated that nearly 90% of customers ceased using IMLs services within six months of joining, which is a figure that regulators interpret as a strong signal of consumer dissatisfaction and potential financial harm.
The FTC contends that IML functioned as a multi-level marketing (MLM) operation. Members were encouraged to recruit new participants while selling access to the companys educational content. This recruitment-driven structure, according to the lawsuit, allowed the firm to amass approximately $1.2 billion from consumers since 2018 under misleading premises.
The company‘s founders, Christopher Terry and Isis Terry, are named in the lawsuit, along with leading promoters Jason Brown, Alex Morton, Matthew Rosa, and Brandon Boyd. They face charges of violating several federal laws, including the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act.
Regulators stressed the severity of the alleged misconduct. The FTCs Bureau of Consumer Protection emphasised the broad scale of the operation and the significant damage inflicted, particularly on younger consumers seeking financial independence. The agency underscored that unrealistic income projections and unsupported claims of financial expertise misled many individuals.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Cross border scam syndicates are constantly adapting to evade law enforcement by moving from Cambodia to Vietnam.

HIJA MARKETS, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage entity, is dealing with multiple trading complaints from users worldwide. Among the complaints, what captured our imagination was the $3,000 fee demand for the unfreezing of profits on the broker’s platform. Such a payment demand immediately raises legitimacy concerns regarding the brokerage firm. Complaints do not stop here; in fact, they suggest a pattern of disappearing funds and endless withdrawal denials. Many traders have accused the broker of carrying out illicit trading activities online. In this HIJA MARKETS review 2026, we have examined every user allegation against the brokerage firm. To give you more means to assess its legitimacy, we have given a thorough look into its regulatory framework.

Dubai’s regulator says brokerage firms in the DIFC are expanding faster than their internal controls, highlighting gaps in staff trading oversight, record-keeping, and compliance culture as the sector grows rapidly.

The top 10 retail brokers accounted for 69% of global web visibility in May 2026, with shifts at the top of the ranking as OANDA maintained first place but saw its lead over competitors narrow.