WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CFTC fines Nasdaq Futures $22M for providing misleading info and violating Core Principles. This penalty underscores the importance of transparency in financial markets.

Washington, DC - The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Nasdaq Futures, Inc. $22 million, a former designated contract market (DCM). The penalty is the result of the company's failure to disclose important data about its incentive programs to both the CFTC and the public, as well as submitting incorrect and misleading information to the regulatory body. This fine emphasizes the CFTC's strict regulation of market activities as well as the value of openness in the financial sector.
The CFTC's inquiry showed that Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed to create, monitor, or enforce regulations governing an incentive program given to select traders on its platform. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) requires DCMs, such as Nasdaq Futures, to follow specified Core Principles aimed at maintaining market integrity and safeguarding participants. Among these principles is the duty to provide the CFTC, market participants, and the general public with accurate and full information.
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. failed in this respect by failing to disclose all aspects of its incentive scheme. In particular, the business did not notify the CFTC about a volume-based component of its “Designated Market Maker” (DMM) program. This component provides extra payouts to specific participants depending on the overall amount of contracts exchanged, a critical fact that was concealed in CFTC communications.
Nasdaq Futures, Inc., was a DCM that specialized in energy commodity futures contracts between July 2015 and July 2018. During this time, the business launched a number of incentive schemes, including the DMM program, which paid a set monthly stipend to market makers to boost market liquidity. However, the CFTC was purposely kept unaware of the existence of a volume-based incentive inside this scheme.

According to the CFTC's ruling, Nasdaq Futures, Inc. provided incorrect and misleading information concerning the DMM program. When questioned by CFTC officials, workers consistently denied the existence of volume-based incentives despite the fact that such payments were given to some program participants. These practices violated the CEA and undercut the CFTC's expectation of trust and openness from regulated firms.
The CFTC's ruling also cited Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s failure to follow regulatory service provider guidelines. The corporation was instructed to contact three DMM program members about a particular trading activity, but it did not do so and did not record the reasons for its decision. This lapse added to the breaches of other DCM Core Principles.
CFTC Director of Enforcement Ian McGinley underscored the gravity of the infractions, adding, “The CFTC's oversight regime is dependent on CFTC-designated exchanges providing accurate information to the CFTC and market participants.” Nasdaq Futures, Inc.'s actions here constitute severe breaches of both its responsibility to furnish such information and multiple statutory Core Principles applicable to CFTC-designated exchanges.
The $22 million civil monetary penalty issued on Nasdaq Futures, Inc. exemplifies the repercussions of failing to comply with regulatory standards. The CFTC's action emphasizes the significance of openness and correct reporting in ensuring market stability.
This case is keenly watched by the financial sector, as it demonstrates the CFTC's commitment to holding corporations accountable for their activities. The penalties also send a strong message to all market players about the necessity of complying with regulatory requirements and the consequences of non-compliance.
The CFTC expressed gratitude to the National Futures Association for their help in this instance. Brett Shanks, Elsie Robinson, Jeff Le Riche, Brandon Wozniak, Margaret Aisenbrey, Jordon Grimm, Christopher Reed, Charles Marvine, and former Division of Enforcement employee Jo Mettenburg were all engaged in this case.
Nasdaq Futures, Inc. received a $22 million penalty for failing to disclose critical information and making deceptive representations to the CFTC. This case emphasizes the crucial necessity of regulatory compliance and openness in financial markets and confirms the CFTC's responsibility to ensure market stability.
Stay updated on this and other financial news by visiting our WikiFX news page for the latest updates and in-depth coverage.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.