简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
OANDA Steps Up Legal Battle Against GAIN Capital Over Patent Issues
Abstract:OANDA refines its legal claims against GAIN Capital in a patent dispute, as both forex giants continue their battle in New Jersey District Court.

The legal battle between two of the forex trading industry's behemoths, OANDA and GAIN Capital, has yet to be resolved. This week, the New Jersey District Court hosted the newest round in this continuing battle, as the two businesses delivered a joint letter giving light on the current state of events.
In a notable step, OANDA and GAIN Capital reached an agreement that allowed OANDA to refine their infringement claims. GAIN Capital voiced reservations about the adequacy of OANDA's original claims, which prompted this conclusion. With OANDA agreeing to alter its charges, GAIN Capital must now react with new counterclaims reiterating its non-infringement position.
OANDA has two patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,146,336 (“the '336 patent”) and 8,392,311 (“the '311 patent”). These patents are more than simply numbers; they include a series of advances aimed at revolutionizing currency trading using modern computer networks. The '311 patent, awarded in March 2013, and the '336 patent, issued in December 2006, include a wide variety of components essential to current trading systems. These patents, which include everything from server front-ends, databases, and transaction servers to pricing engines, margin control managers, and hedging engines, seek to create a safe, efficient, and streamlined trading environment.

OANDA is well-known in the Internet trading world, with a reputation for openness and fair play. As a registered organization, OANDA ensures its customers and partners that it adheres to the highest regulatory compliance requirements, establishing it as a reliable platform for traders worldwide.
Individuals interested in learning more about OANDA's services or following this legal case attentively may visit OANDA's thorough dealer website here. Furthermore, WikiFX provides a goldmine of daily news updates for anyone interested in the latest in finance and trading, which can be accessed here.
As the case progresses, both sides keep a purposeful quiet on the complexities of their legal tactics. However, the result of this action might have far-reaching consequences for the fintech and online trading sectors, including impacting future patent litigation and the enforcement of technical breakthroughs in financial services.
This case demonstrates the complicated relationship between technology, intellectual property, and financial markets, as well as the difficulties and possibilities posed by trading's digital revolution. As new details surface, the financial sector anticipates the ramifications of this court action for the larger landscape of online currency trading. Stay tuned for more information as this exciting legal story unfolds.
About OANDA
OANDA is a well-known online trading platform that offers a diverse selection of currency pairings, CFDs, and other financial products. It is notable in the forex trading world for its user-friendly interface, powerful trading tools, and comprehensive training materials. OANDA's dedication to openness and honesty is seen in its stringent adherence to regulatory guidelines. Several top-tier financial authorities around the world regulate it, including the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the National Futures Association (NFA) in the United States, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the United Kingdom, and similar bodies in Canada, Australia, Singapore, and Japan. This multijurisdictional regulatory scrutiny guarantees that OANDA adheres to stringent financial standards, providing customers with a safe and dependable trading environment.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

E TRADE Review: Traders Report Tax on Withdrawals, Poor Customer Service & Fund Scams
Has your E Trade forex trading account been charged a withholding tax fee? Did your account get blocked because of multiple deposits? Did you have to constantly call the officials to unblock your account? Failed to open a premium savings account despite submitting multiple documents? Is fund transfer too much of a hassle at E Trade? Did you find the E Trade customer support service not helpful? In this E Trade review article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look!

mBank Exposed: Top Reasons Why Customers are Giving Thumbs Down to This Bank
Do you find mBank services too slow or unresponsive? Do you find your account getting blocked? Failing to access your account online due to several systemic glitches? Can’t perform the transactions on the mBank app? Do you also witness inappropriate stop-level trade execution by the financial services provider? You are not alone! Frustrated by these unfortunate circumstances, many of its clients have shared negative mBank reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of the reviews. Read on!

In-Depth Uniglobe Markets Commission Fees and Spreads Analysis – What Traders Should Really Know
For experienced traders, the cost of execution is a critical factor in broker selection. Low spreads, fair commissions, and transparent pricing can be the difference between a profitable and a losing strategy over the long term. This has led many to scrutinize the offerings of brokers like Uniglobe Markets, which presents a tiered account structure promising competitive conditions. However, a professional evaluation demands more than a surface-level look at marketing claims. It requires a deep, data-driven analysis of the real trading costs, set against the backdrop of the broker's operational integrity and safety. This comprehensive Uniglobe Markets commission fees and spreads analysis will deconstruct the broker's pricing model, examining its account types, typical spreads, commission policies, and potential ancillary costs. Using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform WikiFX, we will provide a clear-eyed view of the Uniglobe Markets spreads commissions prici

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Regulation and Oversight – A Trader's Guide to the Risks
For experienced traders, the process of selecting a new broker transcends a simple comparison of spreads and leverage. It is a meticulous due diligence exercise where the integrity of the broker's regulatory framework is paramount. Stonefort Securities, a relatively new entrant in the crowded brokerage space, presents a complex and often contradictory profile. On one hand, it boasts a modern MT5 platform and a stream of positive user testimonials. On the other hand, it is shadowed by severe regulatory warnings that question the very foundation of its operations. This in-depth review focuses on the core issue for any long-term trader: Stonefort Securities regulation and oversight. We will dissect the broker's corporate structure, scrutinize its licensing claims, and analyze what the data implies for trader protection and fund security. For traders evaluating whether Stonefort Securities is a trustworthy partner, understanding these details is not just important—it is essential.
