简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
National Audit Office (NAO) Criticizes FCA for its Shortcomings!
Abstract:The National Audit Office, Britain's overseer of public spending, has criticized the Financial Conduct Authority's sluggishness in enforcing actions, particularly citing its approach toward crypto firms across a span of years.

The National Audit Office (NAO), Britain's overseer of public spending, has highlighted the Financial Conduct Authority's sluggishness in enforcing actions, particularly citing its approach toward crypto firms across a span of years.
The United States recently made waves with a noteworthy $4 billion settlement involving Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange, whereas the United Kingdom's progression has been notably more measured in comparison. According to a report released on Friday by the National Audit Office (NAO), the FCA's enforcement actions exhibit considerable delays even when issues fall within its jurisdiction.
Highlighting the FCA's handling of crypto firms, the report emphasizes the prolonged timelines for the FCA to initiate enforcement actions, even when well within its authority. Despite the FCA's directive from January 2020 requiring crypto firms to register, it wasn't until February 2023 that the regulator began enforcing actions against illegal operators of crypto ATMs, following its supervision efforts and engagements with unregistered firms.

The report cites the FCA's public disclosure stating a substantial 68% decline in reported crypto ATM activities in 2022, albeit attributing this drop partially to the FCA's actions. However, the regulator has faced ongoing criticism from the crypto industry due to sluggish processing of registration applications. The FCA has attributed this delayed pace to challenges in staff retention, particularly in acquiring and maintaining employees possessing specialized skills in crypto compliance.
The Head of NAO, Gareth Davies, emphasized that the FCA is experiencing substantial reform, reacting to shifts in the financial services regulatory framework and implementing operational adjustments aimed at enhancing performance.
Investing £317m in its transformation program from 2020 to 2023, the FCA increased its staff by 16%, particularly focusing on recruiting specialized skills, notably in the crypto sector, facing registration and enforcement challenges due to skill shortages.
Davies highlighted that it is imperative for the FCA to optimize its utilization of data, evaluating its intended outcomes and resource allocation to achieve maximum impact.
Bolstering data management capabilities through a data lake upgrade and improved tools for information access and analytics, the FCA aims to reduce data risks and enhance operational efficiency.
The NAO recommends refining operational processes, engaging stakeholders for evaluating new accountability arrangements' effectiveness, providing clearer performance metrics, and devising a long-term workforce plan.
The FSMA 2023 significantly broadened the FCA's rule-making authority, bringing it under closer Parliamentary scrutiny. Establishing new independent accountability mechanisms is a key mandate for the FCA, expected to be in place by 2024.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

JP Markets Review: High Spread & Commission, Fake Bonus Lure & Withdrawal Hassles Frustrate Traders
Have you been lured into opening a JP Markets Forex Trading Account with a high bonus offer that never existed? Have you found the spread and commission charges higher on JP Markets Login than what’s advertised on the broker’s website? Wondering why you are not able to withdraw funds from your trading account? Well, all of these hint at a potential forex investment scam. Many traders have expressed their disappointment while sharing the JP Markets Review online. In this article, we have shared certain complaints. Take a look at them.

Angel one 2025 Review & Complaints
Angel One is a well-known name in the forex market. People are familiar with the name , but is this broker really worth your interest? What do real users say about Angel One, and what complaints have they shared? In this Angel One 2025 review, you will explore all these details.

Exclusive Markets Under the Scanner: Traders Report High Swap Charges, Deposit Discrepancies & More
Is your forex trading account experience at Exclusive Markets far from good? Do you witness high swap fees and daily charges? Does the deposit fail to reflect in your Exclusive Markets Login? Don’t receive adequate response from the customer support official on your trading queries? You are not alone! Traders have already alleged that the forex broker is involved in these activities. In this Exclusive Markets WikiFX review article, we shared some traders’ comments. Read on to know about them.

Interactive Brokers Fined for FINRA Market Data Lapses
Interactive Brokers fined $150,000 by FINRA over Vendor Display Rule violations and supervisory gaps; firm adds real-time consolidated data displays.
