简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Charges FinTech Investment Adviser Titan for Violations
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued charges against Titan Global Capital Management USA LLC, an investment adviser based in New York specializing in FinTech, for employing misleading hypothetical performance metrics in its advertisements.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued charges against Titan Global Capital Management USA LLC, an investment adviser based in New York specializing in FinTech, for employing misleading hypothetical performance metrics in its advertisements.
Furthermore, the SEC has brought forward allegations of multiple compliance failures against Titan. These failures resulted in inaccurate disclosures related to the custody of clients' cryptocurrency assets, the inclusion of inappropriate “hedge clauses” in client agreements, unauthorized utilization of client signatures, and the absence of policies governing crypto asset trading by employees.
According to the SEC's official order, during a period spanning from August 2021 to October 2022, Titan, which provides diverse intricate strategies to retail investors through a mobile trading app, disseminated misleading information on its website concerning hypothetical performance. This included advertising “annualized” performance results reaching as high as 2,700 percent for their Titan Crypto strategy.
The order asserts that these advertisements by Titan were misleading due to their omission of crucial details. For instance, the hypothetical performance projections assumed that the performance achieved in the strategy's initial three weeks would persist for an entire year.
Additionally, the order highlights Titan's violation of the marketing rule by promoting hypothetical performance metrics without fulfilling the necessary requirements outlined in the Commission's marketing rule, which was revised in December 2020.
The SEC's order further indicates that Titan: (1) provided inconsistent information to clients regarding the custody of crypto assets; (2) introduced liability disclaimer language in client advisory agreements that wrongly implied clients had relinquished their rights to certain legal actions against Titan; and (3) contrary to prior representations, neglected to adopt policies and procedures concerning personal crypto asset trading by its employees.
The order also discloses that Titan voluntarily reported to the SEC staff regarding its failure to obtain client signatures for specific types of transactions in client accounts. The company has agreed to settle the associated charges.
In a collaborative gesture, Titan cooperated with the investigation and consented to the SEC's order, which confirms violations of the Advisers Act. While neither admitting nor denying the SEC's findings, Titan has accepted a cease-and-desist order, a censure, and a financial settlement that encompasses $192,454 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty amounting to $850,000. This penalty will be distributed to clients who were affected by these actions.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Neotrades Review: Traders Claim Profit Cuts, False Assurances & Unfair Terms
Do you feel constant pressure from Neotrades to deposit your forex capital? Were you given a false assurance by the broker on recovering your trade losses? Have all your profits been wiped to ZERO on the Neotrades login? Does the Mauritius-based forex broker apply stringent terms and conditions for profit withdrawals? In this Neotrades review article, we have showcased these complaints. Read them below.

Thailand Strikes Back: Online Scam Losses Plunge ฿195M+
Thailand’s Anti-Cyber Scam Centre (ACSC) reported 392 fewer online scam cases and a 31.4% week-on-week drop in losses—over ฿195 million saved—driven by police suppression and public awareness. Authorities caution that syndicates are relocating and exploiting events (e.g., southern floods). While online purchase fraud remains most common, “reward transfer” scams now cause the highest losses, surpassing investment scams.

FXFlat Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Issues, High Slippage & Poor Customer Support Service
Making profits, but FXFlat is cancelling all of them? Do you constantly face losses due to slippage by the Germany-based forex broker? Is your forex trading account getting deactivated after making the FXFlat withdrawal request? Do you have to constantly deal with poor customer support issues? You are not alone! Many traders have openly expressed their frustration over these issues online. In this FXFlat review article, we have shared some of their complaints. Read on!

When the Licence Disappears: What Traders Overlook About Their Brokers
In the foreign exchange and online trading industries, regulation is often referred to as a technical requirement. Yet for traders of all levels, a broker’s regulatory status is one of the most fundamental markers of safety and transparency. When a broker loses its licence, it is never a minor administrative event. It signals structural problems that can place client funds and trading conditions at significant risk. Understanding why brokers lose their licences, what it means, and how traders can stay informed is essential in today’s rapidly shifting financial landscape.
