简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
CySEC to Assess Regulated Companies On-Site
Abstract:Cyprus Securities and Exchange (CySEC) announces plans for on-site assessments of regulated companies while warning the public about impersonators posing as regulatory officials. Also, do you know WikiFX also conducts field survey to verify brokers on-site? Read more to see how to assess this underrated feature of WikiFX!

Cyprus Securities and Exchange (CySEC) has recently revealed its intentions to conduct thorough assessments of regulated companies that provide investment services to retail clients. The evaluations, scheduled for the second half of 2023, will involve on-site visits and desk-based reviews targeting a sample of Cyprus Investment Firms (CIFs). The primary objective of this action is to evaluate how CIFs adhere to the marketing communication requirements outlined in MiFID II, ultimately bolstering investor protection as per ESMA's objectives.
CySEC's decision was prompted by the European Securities and Markets Authority's (ESMA) campaign, which seeks to examine the implementation of MiFID II disclosure rules concerning marketing communications across the European Union (EU). ESMA's review focuses on assessing the fairness, clarity, and absence of misleading information in marketing communications.
Furthermore, the evaluation encompasses marketing and advertising strategies employed by firms through various distribution channels, encompassing applications, websites, social media platforms, and partnerships with affiliates, including influencers. ESMA aims to gather insights into potential instances of “greenwashing” within marketing communications and advertisements.
ESMA is particularly concerned about the vulnerability of younger, less experienced investors who operate online, leading them to evaluate marketing practices in light of these risks.
Do you know that WikiFX regularly conducts field survey visits to broker companies to gather firsthand information about their authenticity. By physically visiting these companies, WikiFX aims to provide investors with accurate and reliable information regarding the credibility and reliability of brokers. The combination of WikiFX's field survey visits and CySEC's on-site evaluations collectively reinforces investor protection and contributes to the overall integrity of the forex market. These initiatives promote a safer and more trustworthy environment for retail clients, instilling confidence in the regulated companies they choose to engage with. Through these collaborative efforts, investors can have increased confidence in the regulated companies they engage with, fostering a more secure and reliable trading experience.
Follow the screenshots below to assess the results of WikiFXs global field visit surveys worldwide:
Type the broker‘s name into the search bar within WikiFX’s mobile application.

Click on the field survey column on the selected brokers profile page to see the full result.




In addition to the regulatory evaluations, CySEC has also issued a warning addressing the alarming rise in cases of individuals impersonating regulatory officers and representatives.

This recent cautionary announcement joins a series of similar warnings issued by the Cypriot regulator. In a prior incident from November of the previous year, the regulator identified instances where individuals and fraudulent websites impersonated CySEC officers, representatives, and even the official website.
The current focus of concern revolves around imposters attempting to solicit fees from victims by promising to settle counterfeit compensation claims related to firms under CySEC supervision. Fraudsters assume the guise of CySEC officers and appointed representatives, contacting potential victims via email and telephone, often using persuasive phone numbers, names, and even official stamps. These scammers target clients of CySEC-regulated entities, deceiving them with false promises of assistance in obtaining compensation and unlawfully acquiring additional personal information.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
