简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Digital Assets to be Treated as Gambling by ECB
Abstract:Do you think cryptocurrency a gamble or an investment backed with fundamentals? Well, the European Central Bank labels cryptocurrency as a gambling activity but do you know why?

Fabio Panetta, a European Central Bank's (ECB) Executive Board member, has called for greater oversight in the wake of crises and controversy reshaping the world of international cryptocurrency trading.
Panetta argued that recent events had increased the need for greater regulation of cryptocurrencies in several areas in a blog post posted on the ECB's website.
He said that unbacked cryptocurrencies should be treated as gambling activities because of their speculative nature and significant value fluctuation as their values are not supported by legitimate assets but rather by supply and demand.
The executive refers to a string of collapses involving cryptocurrencies to highlight crypto players' extremely high leverage, interconnectedness across the crypto ecosystem, and inadequate governance structures.
Panetta understands that the cryptocurrency sector is here to stay, unlike other regulators who view it as another “bubble” or scam. He emphasises that cryptocurrency, as opposed to any reliable investment asset, is more akin to “a vehicle for gambling.”
Cryptocurrency is a rapidly evolving market, much like the betting and gaming sector. In Panetta's opinion, regulators must move quickly to ensure they keep up with new developments.
He argued that regulators should focus on how cryptocurrencies can be used for money laundering, financing terrorism, and evading sanctions, as well as the risk that investors will lose a significant amount of money. Therefore, in order to protect vulnerable users from these unbacked digital assets, application of rules similar to the European Commission-recommended principles for online gambling should be applied.
Tighter cryptocurrency regulations and urges for gambling laws to be applied to blockchain-based products are not new. They have worsened over the past year as both sectors have become more interconnected, and the former has expanded.
For instance, the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has stated numerous times that it intends to take into account “new and emerging” products, such as NFTs before the UK Gambling Act review White Paper is released.
Increased regulation could affect both industries as they become more intertwined, with crypto accounting for a significant portion of wagers last year, albeit at a lower rate than in prior years, according to SOFTSWISS.
Dr George Theocharides, the Chairman of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), cautioned against the dangers of investing in cryptocurrencies and supported MiCA in October 2022. In addition, the head of CySEC criticised the speculative nature of digital assets in a piece posted on the regulator's website.
The collapse of FTX, which caused significant turbulence across the crypto markets, hasn't deterred crypto-betting companies, according to SBC's research. For instance, in an interview in November, BetDEX CEO Varun Sudhakar expressed continued optimism about the market's prospects.
So, what do you think? Do you agree with the ECB that cryptocurrencies are a form of gamble or do you think that cryptocurrencies have a bright future and is a long-term investment? As Richard Branson said, “two heads are definitely better than one”, start or join any topic of discussion in WikiFXs forum page to bounce ideas off other traders/investors.
Download the free WikiFX mobile app from Google Play/App Store and follow the instructions below to get your discussion up and running:



Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
