Mazi Finance Scam Exposure: A Warning to Indian Traders
Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The company breached licensing obligations. The regulator also banned two executives of the OTC derivatives operator.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced on Thursday that over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives provider Sirius Financial Markets Pty Ltd, which operates under the brand Trade360, has surrendered its Australian Financial Services license.
The company is now winding down its retail and wholesale operations from Australia and is aiming to cease offering financial services from 29 July 2022.
It came after a regulatory investigation against the OTC derivatives provider, surfacing several license violations.
“ASIC‘s investigation uncovered concerning consumer losses from trading in CFDs, including a Sirius Financial investor, who had limited knowledge of the market, losing over $400,000 after being told CFDs were a safe investment,” said ASIC’s Commissioner, Danielle Press.
According to the regulatory investigation, the company engaged an offshore call center, Toyga Media Ltd, to source clients, who would be trading high-risk instruments like contracts for differences (CFDs) and margin forex contracts.
The call center used pressure selling tactics to persuade the clients to trade on the Sirius platform. They even provided clients with financial advice, but Sirius was not licensed for offering such services.
Additionally, ASIC stated that “Sirius Financial was also found to have engaged in unconscionable conduct and conduct that was likely to mislead or deceive.”
Moreover, the Aussie regulator banned two of Sirius Financials former executives, Jonathan Schneider and Oskar Pecyna, for eight years from controlling any financial services business or holding any executive or management role in such companies.
Both Schneider and Pecyna were involved in the license obligation breaches by Sirius. They were not adequately trained and not competent in controlling a financial services business, the regulator stated.
“In reaching these findings, ASIC found that both men failed to adequately perform their duties as responsible managers and lacked the necessary professionalism, integrity, judgement and diligence to play a role in the management or control of a financial services provider,” ASIC added.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Latest India Mazi Finance scam: Failed XAUUSD execution despite margin, costing $675—fake “insufficient balance” excuse. Protect funds, read the full report now!

Does Pemaxx prevent you from withdrawing funds once you make profits? Has the Mauritius-based forex broker disabled your trading account upon your withdrawal request? Do you fail to withdraw funds despite meeting the trading lot requirements? These scam-like trading activities have allegedly become a part of the broker’s operation, as many traders have complained about them online. In this Pemaxx review article, we have highlighted their comments against the forex broker. Keep reading!

Did Fortune Prime Global deduct all your profits by accusing you of market manipulation? Are you struggling to access withdrawals for months? Has the forex broker disabled your forex trading account upon the withdrawal application? Does the broker stipulate tax payments as a condition for fund withdrawals? You are not alone! In this Fortune Prime Global review article, we have highlighted these complaints. Read on!

UNIGLOBEMARKET presents a mixed picture that demands careful consideration from prospective traders, earning an overall rating of 5.5 out of 10 with a "Use with Caution" designation. Based on 55 trader reviews, the broker shows a concerning 40% negative rate, though it's worth noting that positive reviews still outnumber negative ones with 31 favorable assessments compared to 22 unfavorable ones. Read on for an insightful review.