简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
WikiFX report: Court finally terminates CFTC case against JAFX
Abstract:The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a case against unlicensed Forex broker JAFX, which was finally dismissed by the Utah District Court.

The Utah District Court has finally closed a case brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against unregistered Forex broker JAFX.
Lets recall that the case was launched in July 2018. The CFTC Complaint alleged that, from at least September 2016 and continuing to the summer of 2018, JAFX operated as a retail foreign exchange (forex) dealer, without being registered with the CFTC, as required, and that it failed to provide customers with the required Risk Disclosure Statement.
Specifically, the CFTC‘s Complaint alleged that JAFX has been the counterparty to leveraged, retail forex transactions for customers located in the United States, who are not Eligible Contract Participants (ECPs). JAFX allegedly solicits orders from U.S. customers who are not ECPs to open leveraged, retail forex trading accounts through JAFX’s website, as well as videos on YouTube, where JAFX is, or offers to be, the counterparty to each leveraged retail forex transaction. Customers were directed to open trading accounts by submitting an online account application through JAFXs website, and JAFX encouraged customers to access and trade their accounts via a mobile application, according to the Complaint.
U.S. customers could allegedly open an account with JAFX for as little as $100.
In June 2020, a supplemental consent order was entered among the parties so that the case would be resolved. That order provided that JAFX will have to pay a civil monetary penalty of $600,000. The proposed Supplemental Consent Order was said to have resolved all issues in the case.
However, the proceedings remained ongoing for unknown reason. On September 29, 2021, the Court finally issued an order closing the case. The lawsuit was terminated as per the supplemental consent order.
The Utah District Court has not been involved in Forex cases often. Apart from JAFX, another case that proceeded there was the CFTC lawsuit brought against Tallinex.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Related broker
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
