简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
EU Parliament Approves Wallet Host Identity Revealing Bill for a Final Vote
Abstract:The bill is expected to move for trilogues with the European Commission and the European Council within the next two weeks.

Key Insights:
The ECON – LIBE voting session ended with the bill receiving majority support.
The bill is not expected to observe friction during the final vote either.
Crypto community observes this as a massive blow to self-hosted wallets.
The sovereignty of crypto lies in its decentralization, anonymity, and independence, but it seems like the EU Parliament does not much care for it.
The voting session that ended today puts the entire existence of self-hosted wallets at threat of extinction as no one would be willing to lose their right to anonymity in the European Union.
Another Threat to Crypto
The ECON – LIBE voting session released the results of the roll-call votes in which the votes were tallied as 58 for, 52 against, with 7 abstentions. This results in the approval of the amendments to the Transfer of Funds Regulation.
According to these amendments, crypto service providers will be required to verify the self-hosted wallets, which are also known as “Unhosted wallets”, owners identities.
However, the threat doesnt stop just at these wallets as the crypto service providers, primarily cryptocurrency exchanges, would also fall into the crosshairs of the regulators.
And the approval of this bill would provide the regulators with the ammunition to constantly monitor them, killing the purpose of crypto.
The reason people choose these self-hosted wallets is to ensure privacy and protection.
Still, the EU Parliament intends on abolishing that as the potential threat of an unwarranted investigation into ones business would keep people away from using them, thus bringing an end to this service in the EU.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Kazuaki Takabatake, CCO of Titan FX
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr
