The agent claimed that following their trading signals would yield stable profits. After opening an account with the agent and depositing 1,668 USDT, this account made over 70 frequent large-volume trades within three minutes in the early morning of September 18, 2026, leaving my account balance at 9.94 USDT. I reported this to the platform’s customer service at 5:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m., and 11:00 a.m. on the 18th, and the agent’s account was frozen. Despite ongoing communication, the issue remains unresolved. ACCM account manager Logan Li (Chinese name: Li Ao) and the broker are refusing to address complaints regarding intentional client losses. In 2026, the broker claimed that copy trading would yield stable profits with a 30/70 split. After depositing 1,668 USDT and logging into my account, the broker executed over 70 high-frequency trades within three minutes, resulting in liquidation. The transaction fees totaled 757 USDT—a clear case of intentionally incurring client losses and pocketing fees through automated trading. The platform stated that the broker’s account has been frozen, but account manager Li Ao refuses to address the issue via WeChat and even blocks my messages; this has been dragging on for a long time. The platform asked me to send an email but has never replied. The platform claimed a dedicated representative would handle it, but no one has contacted me. I was told to contact the agent regarding the agent’s issues, but the agent refuses to address them and intentionally uses high-frequency trading to profit from my losses. Does ACCM really lack oversight of its agents? When problems arise and the agent refuses to address them, does the platform simply turn a blind eye? I requested the platform provide information on the intermediary agent, but the platform has not responded. The agent is trading on behalf of clients and pocketing their losses, yet the platform is dragging its feet on resolving the issue. On October 13, Account Manager Logan Li re-added me on WeChat and contacted me via email, promising that the platform would not be held liable for the losses and that agent information would only be provided after I agreed to waive any claims against the platform. When I called, I was told that the agent had maliciously engaged in fake trading to withdraw over 1,300 USDT in commissions and was now unreachable; I was instructed to file a police report myself, as the agent was likely part of a fraud ring. I asked the account manager to provide communication records and the agent’s withdrawal records, but he refused. The fraudulent trading occurred in the early hours of October 17; when I tried to contact platform customer service at 5:00 a.m. on the 18th, I could not reach anyone. At 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., I repeatedly contacted customer service to request that the agent’s account be frozen. Platform customer service claimed it had already been frozen, but the account manager stated that the agent had withdrawn the commission from the fraudulent trading within three hours—without providing any evidence. The account manager admitted that the agent was a fraudster and that it was likely an organized scam, so I filed another complaint against both the platform’s account manager and the agent, demanding compensation for my loss of 1,660 USDT. They told me to acknowledge that the loss had nothing to do with the platform and to waive my right to hold the platform liable—a clear attempt to shirk responsibility.