WikiFX

Rispondi

From my experience analyzing forex brokers, I am careful to assess both transparent fee structures and regulatory standing before engaging any company. With Core Financial Markets Ltd, I noticed a lack of clear and reliable regulatory oversight, as well as a very low trustworthiness score. The broker operates out of Comoros, and its business license is marked as "suspicious," which already raises substantial red flags for me about transparency and client safety. When it comes to inactivity fees, I found no explicit mention or detailed disclosure of such charges on the available sources for this broker. This absence of information does not necessarily mean inactivity fees don’t exist—it could just as easily point to a lack of comprehensive client disclosures, something I view as problematic. In my experience, brokers who are not regulated or whose licenses are questionable often have non-transparent pricing or may introduce hidden fees at their discretion. For me, trading with a broker who provides ambiguous terms regarding inactivity policies would be untenable. If you cannot find definitive information about fees or account policies, especially with brokers holding no valid regulatory status, the risk of encountering unanticipated charges—including inactivity fees—is heightened. I would recommend that anyone considering Core Financial Markets Ltd proceed extremely cautiously and insist on obtaining formal written clarification on all potential fees before opening an account. This approach is especially critical with brokers whose regulatory and business credibility are in doubt.