WikiFX

Rispondi

As an experienced forex trader who evaluates brokers with a strict eye on transparency and risk, I believe it’s vital to point out that Tifia’s publicly available information, as presented, does not disclose anything about inactivity fees or the circumstances under which such charges might be applied. In my searches and reviews, I typically look for explicit fee schedules or terms and conditions covering dormant account fees—especially because inactivity charges can materially erode a trader’s capital if left unchecked. However, in Tifia’s case, the absence of clear information about inactivity fees is already cause for concern. This lack of transparency is particularly significant given Tifia’s regulatory history: their Vanuatu retail forex license has been revoked, and the broker is currently flagged for high risk across multiple criteria, including a zero score in their regulatory and risk management indices. Compounding this, multiple documented user complaints highlight severe issues with both fund withdrawals and customer support responsiveness. For me, this signals that even minor details left unclear—such as the potential for inactivity fees—could mask more serious operational risks. As a result, I would approach any account maintenance questions, including inactivity fees, with heightened caution and would strongly recommend anyone considering Tifia to insist on full, written clarification from the broker before funding an account. In the absence of regulation and proven transparency, even seemingly minor fee uncertainties should be treated conservatively.